ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Predicting Malignancy and Invasiveness of Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules on CT Images Using Deep Learning.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of radiomics, deep learning, and hybrid AI for invasiveness stratification of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Development and internal validation of a high-resolution computed tomography radiomics and three-dimensional deep learning diagnostic prediction model for preoperative differentiation of minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinoma in subsolid nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Predicting Invasiveness of Lung Adenocarcinoma from Chest CT with Few-shot Vision-Language Ternary Classification Model.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning for the invasiveness assessment of ground-glass nodules with fine segmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Integration of intratumoral/peritumoral radiomics and deep learning for predicting overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- An Integrated Nomogram Combining Deep Learning and Radiomics for Predicting Malignancy of Pulmonary Nodules Using CT-Derived Nodules and Adipose Tissue: A Multicenter Study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Neural network-based model for evaluating inert nodules and volume doubling time in T1 lung adenocarcinoma: a nested case-control study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Preoperative Ternary Classification of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules (AIS/MIA/IAC): ResNet-10 Outperforms Radiomics and Clinicoradiographic Models in Multicenter Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo develop and validate a deep learning-based model on CT images for the malignancy and invasiveness prediction of pulmonary subsolid nodules (SSNs). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study retrospectively collected patients with pulmonary SSNs treated by surgery in our hospital from 2012 to 2018. Postoperative pathology was used as the diagnostic reference standard. Three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) models were constructed using preoperative CT images to predict the malignancy and invasiveness of SSNs. Then, an observer reader study conducted by two thoracic radiologists was used to compare with the CNN model. The diagnostic power of the models was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.
resultsA total of 2,614 patients were finally included and randomly divided for training (60.9%), validation (19.1%), and testing (20%). For the benign and malignant classification, the best 3D CNN model achieved a satisfactory AUC of 0.913 (95% CI: 0.885-0.940), sensitivity of 86.1%, and specificity of 83.8% at the optimal decision point, which outperformed all observer readers' performance (AUC: 0.846±0.031). For pre-invasive and invasive classification of malignant SSNs, the 3D CNN also achieved satisfactory AUC of 0.908 (95% CI: 0.877-0.939), sensitivity of 87.4%, and specificity of 80.8%.
conclusionThe deep-learning model showed its potential to accurately identify the malignancy and invasiveness of SSNs and thus can help surgeons make treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.