ArticleSleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
Mizan sleep quality and Sleep Hygiene Index MiSQuaSHI: a psychometric investigation.
Article in Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of mental health screening tools applicable to adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Association between sleep hygiene practices scale and sleep quality in Black and Latinx patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.Sleep medicine: X · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePoor sleep quality and unhealthy sleep hygiene practices are often correlated and co-existing. However, there is no single validated tool to assess both sleep quality and sleep hygiene practices. Therefore, this study presents psychometric validation findings of an instrument developed to assess both sleep quality and sleep hygiene practices. MATERIAL AND
methodsA sample (n=395, age = 21.9±4.2 years, body mass index = 20.86±3.22kg/m2, male = 328, female = 67) from Mizan-Tepi University, Ethiopia, completed this cross-sectional study involving the perceived stress scale 10 (PSS -10), the generalized anxiety disorder-7 scale (GAD-7), the Mizan sleep quality and sleep hygiene index (MiSQuaSHI), the Leeds sleep evaluation questionnaire-Mizan (LSEQ-M) and a socio-demographics tool.
resultsNo significant skewness, kurtosis, and ceiling/floor effect were seen in the MiSQuaSHI total score. The discriminative validity was favored by significant differences (8 item scores, MiSQuaSHI total and factor scores) in students with moderate-severe GAD than normal. The concurrent validity test found an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 (CI 0.76-0.85; p<.0001) with a sensitivity and specificity of 62% and 88%, respectively at the cut-off score of 7.5 with the LSEQ-M. The divergent validity was evidenced by correlations of MiSQuaSHI total score with both GAD -7 (r=0.24) and PSS -10 (r=0.20). The internal consistency was adequate (Cronbach's alpha=0.70). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results were inconsistent. However, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) found that the 5-factor model had the best fit. DISCUSSION: The findings support the validity of the MiSQuaSHI as a global measure of poor sleep quality associated with poor sleep hygiene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.