ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021
A Fluid-Structure Interaction Study of Different Bicuspid Aortic Valve Phenotypes Throughout the Cardiac Cycle.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the Haemodynamic Behaviour of Stenosed Aortic Heart Valves Using Fluid Structure Interaction Modelling.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Development of a Polymeric TAVR Device Tailored to Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients Using In Silico Design Optimization and Evaluation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Algorithmic Generation of Parameterized Geometric Models of the Aortic Valve and Left Ventricle.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Patient-specific analysis of bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model.Computers in biology and medicine · 2024Article
- Smoothed particle hydrodynamics based FSI simulation of the native and mechanical heart valves in a patient-specific aortic model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Designing a Novel Asymmetric Transcatheter Aortic Valve for Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valves Using Patient-Specific Computational Modeling.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Clinical Impact of Computational Heart Valve Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Right ventricular afterload in repaired D-TGA is associated with inefficient flow patterns, rather than stenosis alone.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a congenital malformation of the aortic valve with a variety of structural features. The current research on BAV mainly focuses on the systolic phase, while ignoring the diastolic hemodynamic characteristics and valve mechanics. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences in hemodynamics and mechanical properties of BAV with different phenotypes throughout the cardiac cycle by means of numerical simulation. Based on physiological anatomy, we established an idealized tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) model and six phenotypes of BAV models (including Type 0 a-p, Type 0 lat, Type 1 L-R, Type 1 N-L, Type 1 R-N, and Type 2), and simulated the dynamic changes of the aortic valve during the cardiac cycle using the fluid-structure interaction method. The morphology of the leaflets, hemodynamic parameters, flow patterns, and strain were analyzed. Compared with TAV, the cardiac output and effective orifice area of different BAV phenotypes decreased certain degree, along with the peak velocity and mean pressure difference increased both. Among all BAV models, Type 2 exhibited the worst hemodynamic performance. During the systole, obvious asymmetric flow field was observed in BAV aorta, which was related to the orientation of BAV. Higher strain was generated in diastole for BAV models. The findings of this study suggests specific differences in the hemodynamic characteristics and valve mechanics of different BAV phenotypes, including different severity of stenosis, flow patterns, and leaflet strain, which may be critical for prediction of other subsequent aortic diseases and differential treatment strategy for certain BAV phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.