Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34381329›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Preferential Cochleotoxicity of Cisplatin.

Pattarawadee Prayuenyong, David M Baguley, Corné J Kros, Peter S Steyger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pre-treatment audiological and vestibular assessment in adults starting platinum-based chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmacological Approaches to Hearing Loss.Pharmacological reviews · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Identifying targets to prevent aminoglycoside ototoxicity.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Hair cell toxicology: With the help of a little fish.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pattarawadee PrayuenyongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
David M BaguleyHearing Sciences, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Corné J KrosSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Peter S SteygerTranslational Hearing Center, Biomedical Sciences, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Creighton University · USNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Understanding the progression of hearing loss in an endolymphatic hydrops modelP20GM139762 · NIGMS · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI Hui Hong · 2021 to 2026
$16.1M
HAIR CELL RESPONSES TO OTOTOXIC DRUGSR01DC004555 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI STEYGER, PETER STEPHEN · 2001 to 2020
$6.6M
Clinical factors in aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicityR01DC016680 · NIDCD · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI STEYGER, PETER STEPHEN · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004555NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016680NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM139762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in humans is more predominant in the cochlea than in the vestibule. Neither definite nor substantial vestibular dysfunction after cisplatin treatment has been consistently reported in the current literature. Inner ear hair cells seem to have intrinsic characteristics that make them susceptible to direct exposure to cisplatin. The existing literature suggests, however, that cisplatin might have different patterns of drug trafficking across the blood-labyrinth-barrier, or different degrees of cisplatin uptake to the hair cells in the cochlear and vestibular compartments. This review proposes an explanation for the preferential cochleotoxicity of cisplatin based on current evidence as well as the anatomy and physiology of the inner ear. The endocochlear potential, generated by the stria vascularis, acting as the driving force for hair cell mechanoelectrical transduction might also augment cisplatin entry into cochlear hair cells. Better understanding of the stria vascularis might shed new light on cochleotoxic mechanisms and inform the development of otoprotective interventions to moderate cisplatin associated ototoxicity.

Indexed as

cisplatincochleacochleotoxicityototoxicityvestibularvestibulotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID34381329
PMCPMC8350121
OpenAlexW3186296540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.