Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34381304›Full record

ArticleMeasurement in physical education and exercise science2021

Fundamental Movement Skills and Their Assessment in Primary Schools from the Perspective of Teachers.

Lucy Eddy, Liam J B Hill, Mark Mon-Williams, Nick Preston, Andy Daly-Smith, Gareth Medd, Daniel D Bingham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Measurement in physical education and exercise science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Movement and Physical Activity in Early Childhood Education and Care Policies of Five Nordic Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucy EddySchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, LeedsUK, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3990-1944
Liam J B HillBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4069-5121
Mark Mon-WilliamsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, LeedsUK, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7595-8545
Nick PrestonCentre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, West Yorkshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-7320
Andy Daly-SmithCentre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, West Yorkshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-9376
Gareth MeddCentre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, West Yorkshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9796-4230
Daniel D BinghamBradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5809-7357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests that children struggle to acquire age-appropriate fundamental movement skills (FMS), despite their importance for facilitating physical activity. This has led to calls for routine school-based screening of children's FMS. However, there is limited research exploring schools' capacity to conduct such assessments. This study investigated what factors might affect the adoption and implementation of FMS assessments in primary schools. School staff (n = 853) completed an online questionnaire developed using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior (COM-B) model. A majority reported that knowledge of pupils' FMS ability would be beneficial (65.3%), and 71.8% would assess FMS if support was provided. Barriers included: Capability - few possessed knowledge of FMS (15%); Opportunity - teachers reported 30-60 minutes as acceptable for assessing a class, a substantially shorter period than current assessments require; Motivation - 57.2% stated FMS assessments would increase workload stress. Solutions to these issues are discussed using the COM-B theoretical framework.

Indexed as

assessmentbehavior changeFundamental movement skillsschool

Identifiers

PMID34381304
PMCPMC8300520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.