Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34381093›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Deep negative volume segmentation.

Kristina Belikova, Oleg Y Rogov, Aleksandr Rybakov, Maxim V Maslov, Dmitry V Dylov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristina Belikova *Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Bolshoy Blvd., 30/1, Moscow, Russia, 121205.
Oleg Y Rogov *Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Bolshoy Blvd., 30/1, Moscow, Russia, 121205.
Aleksandr RybakovFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg, L'va Tolstogo Str., 6-8, St. Petersburg, Russia, 197022.
Maxim V MaslovFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg, L'va Tolstogo Str., 6-8, St. Petersburg, Russia, 197022.
Dmitry V DylovSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Bolshoy Blvd., 30/1, Moscow, Russia, 121205. d.dylov@skoltech.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical examination of three-dimensional image data of compound anatomical objects, such as complex joints, remains a tedious process, demanding the time and the expertise of physicians. For instance, automation of the segmentation task of the TMJ (temporomandibular joint) has been hindered by its compound three-dimensional shape, multiple overlaid textures, an abundance of surrounding irregularities in the skull, and a virtually omnidirectional range of the jaw's motion-all of which extend the manual annotation process to more than an hour per patient. To address the challenge, we invent a new workflow for the 3D segmentation task: namely, we propose to segment empty spaces between all the tissues surrounding the object-the so-called negative volume segmentation. Our approach is an end-to-end pipeline that comprises a V-Net for bone segmentation, a 3D volume construction by inflation of the reconstructed bone head in all directions along the normal vector to its mesh faces. Eventually confined within the skull bones, the inflated surface occupies the entire "negative" space in the joint, effectively providing a geometrical/topological metric of the joint's health. We validate the idea on the CT scans in a 50-patient dataset, annotated by experts in maxillofacial medicine, quantitatively compare the asymmetry given the left and the right negative volumes, and automate the entire framework for clinical adoption.

Identifiers

PMID34381093
PMCPMC8357924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.