Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34381070›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Effects of interobserver and interdisciplinary segmentation variabilities on CT-based radiomics for pancreatic cancer.

Jeffrey Wong, Michael Baine, Sarah Wisnoskie, Nathan Bennion, Dechun Zheng, Lei Yu, Vipin Dalal, Michael A Hollingsworth, Chi Lin, Dandan Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Bounding box-based 3D AI model for user-guided volumetric segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on standard-of-care CTs.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2023
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Michael BaineDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Sarah WisnoskieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Nathan BennionDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Dechun ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Lei YuDepartment of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Vipin DalalDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Michael A HollingsworthEppley Institute for Research in Cancer, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Chi LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. clin@unmc.edu.
Dandan ZhengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA. dandan.zheng@unmc.edu.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USFujian Medical University · CNFujian Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNNebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Tissue CoreP50CA127297 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI HOLLINGSWORTH, MICHAEL A. · 2008 to 2018
$17.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics is a method to mine large numbers of quantitative imaging features and develop predictive models. It has shown exciting promise for improved cancer decision support from early detection to personalized precision treatment, and therefore offers a desirable new direction for pancreatic cancer where the mortality remains high despite the current care and intense research. For radiomics, interobserver segmentation variability and its effect on radiomic feature stability is a crucial consideration. While investigations have been reported for high-contrast cancer sites such as lung cancer, no studies to date have investigated it on CT-based radiomics for pancreatic cancer. With three radiation oncology observers and three radiology observers independently contouring on the contrast CT of 21 pancreatic cancer patients, we conducted the first interobserver segmentation variability study on CT-based radiomics for pancreatic cancer. Moreover, our novel investigation assessed whether there exists an interdisciplinary difference between the two disciplines. For each patient, a consensus tumor volume was generated using the simultaneous truth and performance level expectation algorithm, using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) to assess each observer's delineation against the consensus volume. Radiation oncology observers showed a higher average DSC of 0.81 ± 0.06 than the radiology observers at 0.69 ± 0.16 (p = 0.002). On a panel of 1277 radiomic features, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) was calculated for all observers and those of each discipline. Large variations of ICCs were observed for different radiomic features, but ICCs were generally higher for the radiation oncology group than for the radiology group. Applying a threshold of ICC > 0.75 for considering a feature as stable, 448 features (35%) were found stable for the radiation oncology group and 214 features (16%) were stable from the radiology group. Among them, 205 features were found stable for both groups. Our results provide information for interobserver segmentation variability and its effect on CT-based radiomics for pancreatic cancer. An interesting interdisciplinary variability found in this study also introduces new considerations for the deployment of radiomics models.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedObserver VariationPancreatic NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID34381070
PMCPMC8357939
OpenAlexW3187428547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.