ArticleNeural regeneration research2022
A flexible electrode array for determining regions of motor function activated by epidural spinal cord stimulation in rats with spinal cord injury.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrode position, size, and orientation determine efficacy of cervical epidural stimulation to recruit forelimb muscles in rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Multi-Site Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation Facilitates Upper Limb Sensory and Motor Recovery in Severe Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidural stimulation of the spinal cord is a promising technique for the recovery of motor function after spinal cord injury. The key challenges within the reconstruction of motor function for paralyzed limbs are the precise control of sites and parameters of stimulation. To activate lower-limb muscles precisely by epidural spinal cord stimulation, we proposed a high-density, flexible electrode array. We determined the regions of motor function that were activated upon epidural stimulation of the spinal cord in a rat model with complete spinal cord, which was established by a transection method. For evaluating the effect of stimulation, the evoked potentials were recorded from bilateral lower-limb muscles, including the vastus lateralis, semitendinosus, tibialis anterior, and medial gastrocnemius. To determine the appropriate stimulation sites and parameters of the lower muscles, the stimulation characteristics were studied within the regions in which motor function was activated upon spinal cord stimulation. In the vastus lateralis and medial gastrocnemius, these regions were symmetrically located at the lateral site of L1 and the medial site of L2 vertebrae segment, respectively. The tibialis anterior and semitendinosus only responded to stimulation simultaneously with other muscles. The minimum and maximum stimulation threshold currents of the vastus lateralis were higher than those of the medial gastrocnemius. Our results demonstrate the ability to identify specific stimulation sites of lower muscles using a high-density and flexible array. They also provide a reference for selecting the appropriate conditions for implantable stimulation for animal models of spinal cord injury. This study was approved by the Animal Research Committee of Southeast University, China (approval No. 20190720001) on July 20, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.