Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380880›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2022

Neural functions of small heat shock proteins.

Teresa de Los Reyes, Sergio Casas-Tintó

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Teresa de Los ReyesInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Sergio Casas-TintóInstituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto Cajal · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress response is a cellular widespread mechanism encoded by a common protein program composed by multiple cellular factors that converge in a defense reaction to protect the cell against damage. Among many mechanisms described, heat shock proteins were proposed as universally conserved protective factors in the stress core proteome, coping with different stress stimuli through its canonical role in protein homeostasis. However, emerging evidences reveal non-canonical roles of heat shock proteins relevant for physiological and pathological conditions. Here, we review the implications of inducible heat shock proteins in the central nervous system physiology. In particular, we discuss the relevance of heat shock proteins in the maintenance of synapses, as a balanced protective mechanism in central nervous system development, pathological conditions and aging.

Indexed as

agingcentral nervous systemchaperonesenvironmentneuroprotectionpathologystresssynapses

Identifiers

PMID34380880
PMCPMC8504394
OpenAlexW3189338300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.