Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380872›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association

Usefulness of Routine Plain CT the Day After an Interventional EUS Procedure.

Aya Kiyanagi, Toshio Fujisawa, Shigeto Ishii, Ko Tomishima, Yusuke Takasaki, Akinori Suzuki, Mako Ushio, Sho Takahashi, Wataru Yamagata, Yoshihiro Okawa and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: Between reducing the cost and detection of early complications.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aya KiyanagiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo; Department of Gastroenterology, Obihiro Daiichi Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
Toshio FujisawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeto IshiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ko TomishimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke TakasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Akinori SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mako UshioDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Sho TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Wataru YamagataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro OkawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazushige OchiaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki IsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided procedures (I-EUS) are widely accepted as salvage procedures in ERCP-failed cases, and to drain fluid collected in the abdominal cavity. Although I-EUS has a relatively high incidence of complications and is severe/fatal in some cases, no follow-up strategy has been established. In our institution, plain computed tomography (P-CT) is performed routinely the day after I-EUS. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of routine P-CT the day after I-EUS, as a follow-up method, and propose an algorithm.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 81 patients who underwent I-EUS and evaluated the usefulness of P-CT, abdominal X-ray, laboratory data, and symptoms as a follow-up method. An adverse event (AE) was defined as an event requiring any treatment.

resultsTechnical success, clinical success, and AE rates were 96.3%, 90.1%, and 18.9%, respectively. In total, 30 patients had abnormal findings among the follow-up methods: 6 cases underwent additional procedures, 8 underwent medical treatments, and 16 were observed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting AEs were assessed based on P-CT (85.7%, 100%, and 97.5%), X-ray (7.1%, 100%, and 83.5%), laboratory data (71.4%, 83.0%, and 81.0%), and symptoms (92.9%, 86.2%, and 87.3%). The sensitivity and accuracy of the latter two items were as high as those for X-ray, but specificity was lower than those for X-ray and P-CT.

conclusionsRoutine P-CT the day after I-EUS was useful for detecting complications and deciding to perform an invasive salvage procedure. Symptoms and laboratory data were useful to supplement routine P-CT.

Indexed as

DrainageEndosonographyCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdverse eventalgorithminterventional EUSplain CTstent migration.

Identifiers

PMID34380872
PMCPMC8555768
OpenAlexW3192751123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.