ArticleBMJ open2021
Multicentre observational study on practice of ventilation in brain injured patients: the VENTIBRAIN study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04459884 (Multicenter Observational Study on Practice of Ventilation in Brain Injured Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter Observational Study on Practice of Ventilation in Brain Injured Patients
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Arterial Oxygen Tension Thresholds for Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Non-traumatic Acute Brain Injury: A Bayesian Analysis of Three Large Neurocritical Care Datasets.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Dynamic driving pressure and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with acute brain injury: a secondary analysis of the VENTIBRAIN studyIntensive care medicine · 2026Observational
- Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) in Neurocritical Patients: The Hidden Dialog of Brain and Infection.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Ventilation practices in acute brain injured patients and association with outcomes: the VENTIBRAIN multicenter observational study.Intensive care medicine · 2025Observational
- Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
- Brain-lung crosstalk: how should we manage the breathing brain?BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Utilization of mechanical power and associations with clinical outcomes in brain injured patients: a secondary analysis of the extubation strategies in neuro-intensive care unit patients and associations with outcome (ENIO) trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Observational
- Kidney Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: Pathophysiology and General Management.Neurocritical care · 2023Review
- Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Is it so Different?Neurocritical care · 2023Review
- Effects of short-term hyperoxemia on cerebral autoregulation and tissue oxygenation in acute brain injured patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.The Lancet. Neurology · 2022Review
- Mechanical ventilation in acute brain injury patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMechanical ventilatory is a crucial element of acute brain injured patients' management. The ventilatory goals to ensure lung protection during acute respiratory failure may not be adequate in case of concomitant brain injury. Therefore, there are limited data from which physicians can draw conclusions regarding optimal ventilator management in this setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an international multicentre prospective observational cohort study. The aim of the 'multicentre observational study on practice of ventilation in brain injured patients'-the VENTIBRAIN study-is to describe the current practice of ventilator settings and mechanical ventilation in acute brain injured patients. Secondary objectives include the description of ventilator settings among different countries, and their association with outcomes. Inclusion criteria will be adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of traumatic brain injury or cerebrovascular diseases (intracranial haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke), requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation and admission to the ICU. Exclusion criteria will be the following: patients aged <18 years; pregnant patients; patients not intubated or not mechanically ventilated or receiving only non-invasive ventilation. Data related to clinical examination, neuromonitoring if available, ventilator settings and arterial blood gases will be recorded at admission and daily for the first 7 days and then at day 10 and 14. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended on mortality and neurological outcome will be collected at discharge from ICU, hospital and at 6 months follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Ethic committee of Brianza at the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale-Monza. Data will be disseminated to the scientific community by abstracts submitted to the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine annual conference and by original articles submitted to peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04459884.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.