Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380722›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Multicentre observational study on practice of ventilation in brain injured patients: the VENTIBRAIN study protocol.

Chiara Robba, Giuseppe Citerio, Fabio S Taccone, Stefania Galimberti, Paola Rebora, Alessia Vargiolu, Paolo Pelosi, VENTIBRAIN Enlarged Steering committee members, VENTIBRAIN

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04459884 (Multicenter Observational Study on Practice of Ventilation in Brain Injured Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04459884 completednot on this map

Multicenter Observational Study on Practice of Ventilation in Brain Injured Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of Milano BicoccaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled2,299ConditionsMechanical Ventilation, Acute Brain InjuryArmsmechanical ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara Robba *Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genova, Italy kiarobba@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1628-3845
Giuseppe Citerio *School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Miano - Bicocca, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5374-3161
Fabio S TacconeDpt of Intensive Care, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Stefania GalimbertiSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Università Miano - Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Paola ReboraSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Università Miano - Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Alessia VargioluSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Università Miano - Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Paolo PelosiAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genova, Italy.
VENTIBRAIN Enlarged Steering committee members
VENTIBRAIN
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMechanical ventilatory is a crucial element of acute brain injured patients' management. The ventilatory goals to ensure lung protection during acute respiratory failure may not be adequate in case of concomitant brain injury. Therefore, there are limited data from which physicians can draw conclusions regarding optimal ventilator management in this setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an international multicentre prospective observational cohort study. The aim of the 'multicentre observational study on practice of ventilation in brain injured patients'-the VENTIBRAIN study-is to describe the current practice of ventilator settings and mechanical ventilation in acute brain injured patients. Secondary objectives include the description of ventilator settings among different countries, and their association with outcomes. Inclusion criteria will be adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of traumatic brain injury or cerebrovascular diseases (intracranial haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke), requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation and admission to the ICU. Exclusion criteria will be the following: patients aged <18 years; pregnant patients; patients not intubated or not mechanically ventilated or receiving only non-invasive ventilation. Data related to clinical examination, neuromonitoring if available, ventilator settings and arterial blood gases will be recorded at admission and daily for the first 7 days and then at day 10 and 14. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended on mortality and neurological outcome will be collected at discharge from ICU, hospital and at 6 months follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Ethic committee of Brianza at the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale-Monza. Data will be disseminated to the scientific community by abstracts submitted to the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine annual conference and by original articles submitted to peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04459884.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaStrokeAdultBrainHumansIntensive Care UnitsLungMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRespiration, Artificialadult intensive & critical careneurological injuryneurophysiology

Identifiers

PMID34380722
PMCPMC8359464
OpenAlexW3187146298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.