Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380721›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

Estimating spatiotemporal patterns of deaths by COVID-19 outbreak on a global scale.

Fernanda Valente, Marcio Poletti Laurini

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fernanda ValenteDepartament of Economics, FEARP, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marcio Poletti LauriniDepartament of Economics, FEARP, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil laurini@fearp.usp.br.ORCID 0000-0001-5733-2231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur main objective is to estimate the trend of deaths by COVID-19 on a global scale, considering the six continents. STUDY

designThe study design was a retrospective observational study conducted using the secondary data provided by the Our World in Data project on a public domain.

settingThis study was conducted based on worldwide deaths by COVID-19 recorded for the Our World in Data project from 29 February 2020 to 17 February 2021.

methodsEstimating the trend in COVID-19 deaths is not a trivial task due to the problems associated with the COVID-19 data, such as the spatial and temporal heterogeneity, observed seasonality and the delay between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis, indicating a relevant measurement error problem and changing the series' dependency structure. To bypass the aforementioned problems, we propose a method to estimate the components of trend, seasonality and cycle in COVID-19 data, controlling for the presence of measurement error and considering the spatial heterogeneity. We used the proposed model to estimate the trend component of deaths by COVID-19 on a global scale.

resultsThe model was able to capture the patterns in the occurrence of deaths related to COVID-19, overcoming the problems observed in COVID-19 data. We found compelling evidence that spatiotemporal models are more accurate than univariate models to estimate the patterns of the occurrence of deaths. Based on the measures of dispersion of the models' prediction in relation to observed deaths, it is possible to note that the models with spatial component are significantly superior to the univariate model.

conclusionThe findings suggested that the spatial dynamics have an important role in the COVID-19 epidemic process since the results provided evidence that spatiotemporal models are more accurate to estimate the general patterns of the occurrence of deaths related to COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease OutbreaksHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID34380721
PMCPMC8359872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.