SynthesisBMJ open2021
Detection of intracranial hypertension in children using optical coherence tomography: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and reproducibility of handheld and table-mounted optical coherence tomography in children with craniosynostosis.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- A Spectral-Domain-OCT-Guided One-Year Follow-Up of Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improved feasibility of handheld optical coherence tomography in children with craniosynostosis.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Hemodialysis-induced positional changes in lamina cribrosa.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Anterior displacement of Bruch's membrane: a useful sign for intracranial hypertension in craniosynostosis.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Preterm infant retinal OCT markers of perinatal health and retinopathy of prematurity.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic capability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in children aged under 18 years old with intracranial hypertension (IH).
designSystematic review.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review using the following platforms to search the keywords 'optical coherence tomography' and 'intracranial hypertension' from inception to 2 April 2020: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Web of Science, without language restrictions. Our search returned 2729 records, screened by two independent screeners. Studies were graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for observational studies.
resultsTwenty-one studies were included. Conditions included craniosynostosis (n=354 patients), idiopathic IH (IIH; n=102), space-occupying lesion (SOL; n=42) and other pathology (n=29). OCT measures included optic nerve parameters, rim parameters (notably retinal nerve fibre layer thickness) and retinal parameters. Levels of evidence included 2b (n=13 studies), 3b (n=4) and 4 (n=4). Quality of 10 studies was fair and 11 poor. There was inconsistency in OCT parameters and reference measures studied, although OCT did demonstrate good diagnostic capability for IH in craniosynostosis, IIH and SOL.
conclusionsThis systematic review identified various studies involving OCT to assist diagnosis and management of IH in children with craniosynostosis, IIH, SOL and other pathology, in conjunction with established clinical measures of intracranial pressure. However, no level 1 evidence was identified. Validating prospective studies are, therefore, required to determine optimal OCT parameters in this role and to develop formal clinical guidelines. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019154254.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.