Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380657›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

The Mammalian Olfactory Bulb Contributes to the Adaptation of Odor Responses: A Second Perceptual Computation Carried Out by the Bulb.

Douglas A Storace, Lawrence B Cohen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Douglas A StoraceDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520 dstorace@fsu.edu lawrence.b.cohen@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3535-5472
Lawrence B CohenDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520 dstorace@fsu.edu lawrence.b.cohen@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-7747
Florida State University · USYale University · US

Funding

Optical Studies of Neuron Activity and OrganizationR01DC005259 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2002 to 2019
$5.4M
New approaches for better protein voltage sensorsU01NS099691 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2016 to 2018
$2.1M
Defining the functions of olfactory bulb processing via comparison of input and outputR21DC016133 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STORACE, DOUGLAS ANTHONY · 2017 to 2019
$479k
Optical Studies of Neuron Activity and OrganizationR56DC005259 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2007 to 2007
$413k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005259NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016133NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC005259NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While humans and other mammals exhibit adaptation to odorants, the neural mechanisms and brain locations involved in this process are incompletely understood. One possibility is that it primarily occurs as a result of the interactions between odorants and odorant receptors on the olfactory sensory neurons in the olfactory epithelium. In this scenario, adaptation would arise as a peripheral phenomenon transmitted to the brain. An alternative possibility is that adaptation occurs because of processing in the brain. We made an initial test of these possibilities using a two-color imaging strategy to simultaneously measure the activity of the olfactory receptor nerve terminals (input to the bulb) and mitral/tufted cell apical dendrites (output from the bulb) in anesthetized and awake mice. Repeated odor stimulation at the same concentration resulted in a decline in the bulb output, while the input remained relatively stable. Thus, the mammalian olfactory bulb appears to participate in generating the perception of olfactory adaptation under this stimulus condition. Similar experiments conducted previously showed that the bulb may also participate in the perception of concentration invariance of odorant recognition (Storace and Cohen, 2017); thus, the bulb is simultaneously carrying out more than one computation, as is true of other mammalian brain regions and perhaps is the case for all animals with sophisticated nervous systems. However, in contrast with other sensory systems (Van Essen et al., 1992), the very first processing stage in the olfactory system has an output that may directly represent perceptions.

Indexed as

Olfactory BulbOlfactory Receptor NeuronsAnimalsMammalsMiceOdorantsSmellcalcium imagingepifluorescencemitral/tufted cellsolfactory bulbolfactory receptor neurontwo-photon

Identifiers

PMID34380657
PMCPMC8474650
OpenAlexW3189199117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.