Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380567›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

Implementing at-birth, point-of-care HIV testing in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Catherine Wexler, Yvonne Kamau, Elizabeth Muchoki, Shadrack Babu, Nicodemus Maosa, May Maloba, Melinda Brown, Kathy Goggin, Natabhona Mabachi, Brad Gautney and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03435887 (Piloting At-birth Point of Care HIV Testing Strategies in Kenya), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03435887 nacompletednot on this map

Piloting At-birth Point of Care HIV Testing Strategies in Kenya

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,999ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsAlere q HIV-1/2 Detect for point of care infant testing, GeneXpert HIV-1 Qual for point of care infant testing, HIV DNA PCR testing (Standard of Care)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Catherine WexlerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA. cwexler@kumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1891-9165
Yvonne KamauDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Elizabeth MuchokiKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Shadrack BabuKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nicodemus MaosaKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
May MalobaGlobal Health Innovations - Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Melinda BrownDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Kathy GogginHealth Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Natabhona MabachiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Brad GautneyGlobal Health Innovations - USA, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sarah Finocchario-KesslerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Funding

Evaluating the HITSystem to Improve PMTCT Retention and Maternal Viral Suppression in KenyaR01MH121245 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KESSLER, SARAH FINOCCHARIO · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
Piloting at-birth point of care HIV testing strategies in KenyaR01HD076673 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KESSLER, SARAH FINOCCHARIO · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 3R01HD076673-04S2NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076673NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt-birth and point-of-care (POC) testing can expedite early infant diagnosis of HIV and improve infant outcomes. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study describes the implementation of an at-birth POC testing pilot from the perspective of implementing providers and identifies the factors that might support and hinder the scale up of these promising interventions.

methodsWe conducted 28 focus group discussions (FGDs) with 48 providers across 4 study sites throughout the course of a pilot study assessing the feasibility and impact of at-birth POC testing. FGDs were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for a priori themes related to CFIR constructs. This qualitative study was nested within a larger study to pilot and evaluate at-birth and POC HIV testing.

resultsOut of the 39 CFIR constructs, 30 were addressed in the FGDs. While all five domains were represented, major themes revolved around constructs related to intervention characteristics, inner setting, and outer setting. Regarding intervention characteristics, the advantages of at-birth POC (rapid turnaround time resulting in improved patient management and enhanced patient motivation) were significant enough to encourage provider uptake and enthusiasm. Challenges at the intervention level (machine breakdown, processing errors), inner settings (workload, limited leadership engagement, challenges with access to information), and outer setting (patient-level challenges, limited engagement with outer setting stakeholders) hindered implementation, frustrated providers, and resulted in missed opportunities for testing. Providers discussed how throughout the course of the study adaptations to implementation (improved channels of communication, modified implementation logistics) were made to overcome some of these challenges. To improve implementation, providers cited the need for enhanced training and for greater involvement among stakeholders outside of the implementing team (i.e., other clinicians, hospital administrators and implementing partners, county and national health officials). Despite provider enthusiasm for the intervention, providers felt that the lack of engagement from leadership within the hospital and in the outer setting would preclude sustained implementation outside of a research setting.

conclusionDespite demonstrated feasibility and enthusiasm among implementing providers, the lack of outer setting support makes sustained implementation of at-birth POC testing unlikely at this time. The findings highlight the multi-dimensional aspect of implementation and the need to consider facilitators and barriers within each of the five CFIR domains.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03435887 . Retrospectively registered on 19 February 2020.

Indexed as

Birth testingConsolidated Framework for Implementation Science (CFIR)Early infant diagnosisHIVKenyaPediatric HIVPoint-of-careQualitative

Identifiers

PMID34380567
PMCPMC8359118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.