Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380533›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2021

Social media use to improve communication on children and adolescent's health: the role of the Italian Paediatric Society influencers.

Elena Bozzola, Anna Maria Staiano, Giulia Spina, Nicola Zamperini, Francesco Marino, Marco Roversi, Giovanni Corsello, Italian Paediatric Society Executive Board

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elena BozzolaThe Italian Paediatric Society, via Gioberti 60, Rome, Italy. elena.bozzola@opbg.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-019X
Anna Maria StaianoThe Italian Paediatric Society, via Gioberti 60, Rome, Italy.
Giulia SpinaThe Italian Paediatric Society, via Gioberti 60, Rome, Italy.
Nicola ZamperiniThe Italian Paediatric Society, via Gioberti 60, Rome, Italy.
Francesco MarinoThe Italian Paediatric Society, via Gioberti 60, Rome, Italy.
Marco RoversiThe Italian Paediatric Society, via Gioberti 60, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni CorselloThe Italian Paediatric Society, via Gioberti 60, Rome, Italy.
Italian Paediatric Society Executive Board

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFake news on children's and adolescent health are spreading. Internet availability and decreasing costs of media devices are contributing to an easy access to technology by families. Public health organizations are working to contrast misinformation and promote scientific communication. In this context, a new form of communication is emerging social media influencers. Aim of this study is to evaluate the role of paediatric influencers (PI) in communicating information about children and adolescents' health. MATERIALS AND

methodsA group of PI was enrolled from December 2019 to January 2020 by a scientific commission nominated by the Italian Paediatric Society (SIP). PI were asked to share Facebook messages from the official page of the SIP to their own network. Social media tools have been evaluated across 12 months, from July 28, 2019, to July 11, 2020. For the purposes of clarity, we schematically divided the study period as follows: the period of PIs activity (January 6, 2020, to July 11, 2020) and the period when PIs were not yet active (July 28, 2019, to January 4, 2020). Information on Facebook page (lifetime total likes, daily new likes, daily page engaged, daily total reach) and on published post (lifetime post total reach, lifetime post organic reach, lifetime engaged users) were evaluated.

resultsA significant increase in Facebook daily new likes, page engagement and total reach, as well as in lifetime post total and organic reach was evidenced. As for PI, they reported a positive experience in most cases. DISCUSSION: In the digital era, communication strategies are becoming more important, so that the scientific community has to be actively involved in social media communication. Our pilot study demonstrated that the recruitment of paediatric influencers has increased communication and interaction of the SIP Facebook page.

conclusionOur study shows the potential role of influencers: spreading health messages via PI seems to be a successful strategy to promote correct communication about children's and adolescents' health.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthChild HealthConsumer Health InformationSocial MediaAdolescentChildHumansPediatricsPilot ProjectsSocieties, MedicalChildrenCommunicationHealthInfluencerSocial media

Identifiers

PMID34380533
PMCPMC8355871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.