Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380523›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

A qualitative study of the development and utilization of health facility-based immunization microplans in Uganda.

David Kaawa Mafigiri, Constance Iradukunda, Catherine Atumanya, Michael Odie, Arielle Mancuso, Nhan Tran, Janet McGrath, Henry Luzze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

David Kaawa MafigiriCenter for Social Sciences Research on AIDS, School of Social Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. mafigiridk@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2699-4248
Constance IradukundaCenter for Social Sciences Research on AIDS, School of Social Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Catherine AtumanyaCenter for Social Sciences Research on AIDS, School of Social Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Michael OdieCenter for Social Sciences Research on AIDS, School of Social Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Arielle MancusoAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nhan TranAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland.
Janet McGrathDepartment of Anthropology, Center for Social Sciences Research on AIDS, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Henry LuzzeUganda Ministry of Health/UNEPI, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UGAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research · CHCase Western Reserve University · USMinistry of Health · UG

Funding

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research 1610603World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2006, Uganda adopted the Reaching Every District strategy with the goal of attaining at least 80% coverage for routine immunizations in every district. The development and utilization of health facility/district immunization microplans is the key to the strategy. A number of reports have shown suboptimal development and use of microplans in Uganda. This study explores factors associated with suboptimal development and use of microplans in two districts in Uganda to pinpoint challenges encountered during the microplanning process.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted comparing two districts: Kapchorwa, with low immunization coverage, and Luwero with high immunization coverage. Data were collected through multilevel observation of health facilities, planning sessions and planning meetings; records review of microplans, micromaps and meeting minutes; 57 interviews with health workers at the ministry level and lower-level health facility workers. Data were analysed using NVivo 8 qualitative text analysis software. Transcripts were coded, and memos and display matrices were developed to examine the process of developing and utilizing microplans, including experiences of health workers (implementers).

resultsThree key findings emerged from this study. First, there are significant knowledge gaps with regard to the microplanning process among health workers at all levels (community and district health facility and nationally). Limited knowledge about communities and programme catchment areas greatly hinders the planning process by limiting the ability to identify hard-to-reach areas and to prioritize areas according to need. Secondly, the microplanning tool is bulky and complex. Finally, microplanning is being implemented in the context of already overtasked health personnel who have to conduct several other activities as part of their daily routines.

conclusionsIn order to achieve quality improvement as outlined in the Reaching Every District campaign, the microplanning process should be revised. Health workers' misunderstanding and limited knowledge about the microplanning process, especially at peripheral health facilities, coupled with the complex, bulky nature of the microplanning tool, reduces the effectiveness of microplanning in improving routine immunization in Uganda. This study reveals the need to reduce the complexity of the tool and to identify ways to train and support workers in the use of the revised tool, including support in incorporating the microplanning process into their busy schedules.

Indexed as

ImmunizationVaccinationHealth FacilitiesHumansImmunization ProgramsUgandaMicroplanQualitative studyRoutine immunizationUgandaUtilization

Identifiers

PMID34380523
PMCPMC8356367
OpenAlexW3142318409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.