Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380519›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

Cross-cutting lessons from the Decision-Maker Led Implementation Research initiative.

Arielle Mancuso, Shahira Ahmed Malm, Alyssa Sharkey, A S M Shahabuddin, Zubin Cyrus Shroff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The value and promise of embedded research.Health research policy and systems · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arielle MancusoAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO headquarters, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. amancus3@jh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6594-0376
Shahira Ahmed MalmNutrition Section, United Nations Children's Fund, UNICEF headquarters, New York, NY, 10017, United States of America.
Alyssa SharkeyImplementation Research and Delivery Science Unit, Health Section, United Nations Children's Fund, UNICEF headquarters, New York, NY, 10017, United States of America.
A S M ShahabuddinImplementation Research and Delivery Science Unit, Health Section, United Nations Children's Fund, UNICEF headquarters, New York, NY, 10017, United States of America.
Zubin Cyrus ShroffAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, WHO headquarters, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlmost 20 million children under one year of age did not receive basic vaccines in 2019, and most of these children lived in low- and middle-income countries. Implementation research has been recognized as an emerging area that is critical to strengthen the implementation of interventions proven to be effective. As a component of strengthening implementation, WHO has called for greater embedding of research within decision-making processes. One strategy to facilitate the embedding of research is to engage decision-makers as Principal Investigators of the research. Since 2015, the Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research within the WHO and the United Nations Children's Fund have supported decision-maker led research by partnering with Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, in an initiative called "Decision-Maker Led Implementation Research". This synthesis paper describes the cross-cutting lessons from the initiative to further understand and develop future use of the decision-maker led strategy.

methodsThis study used qualitative methods of data collection, including a document review and in-depth interviews with decision-makers and researchers engaged in the initiative. Document extraction and thematic content analysis were applied. The individual project was the unit of analysis and the results were summarized across projects.

resultsResearch teams from 11 of the 14 projects participated in this study, for an overall response rate of 78.6%. Most projects were carried out in countries in Africa and conducted at the sub-state or sub-district level. Seven enablers and five barriers to the process of conducting the studies or bringing about changes were identified. Key enablers were the relevance, acceptability, and integration of the research, while key barriers included unclear results, limited planning and support, and the limited role of a single study in informing changes to strengthen implementation.

conclusionsDecision-maker led research is a promising strategy to facilitate the embedding of research into decision-making processes and contribute to greater use of research to strengthen implementation of proven-effective interventions, such as immunization. We identified several lessons for consideration in the future design and use of the decision-maker led strategy.

Indexed as

Health PolicyVaccinesChildDecision MakingHumansResearch PersonnelVaccinationVaccinesAfricaAsiaDecision-Maker Led ResearchEmbedded ResearchImmunizationImplementation ResearchVaccination

Identifiers

PMID34380519
PMCPMC8356374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.