Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380514›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

Social media, vaccine hesitancy and trust deficit in immunization programs: a qualitative enquiry in Malappuram District of Kerala, India.

Anoop T Nair, Kesavan Rajasekharan Nayar, Shaffi Fazaludeen Koya, Minu Abraham, Jinbert Lordson, Chitra Grace, Sreekutty Sreekumar, Priya Chembon, Kamala Swarnam, A Marthanda Pillai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Facilitators of and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination in Grenada: a qualitative study.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Worldwide vaccine inequality threatens to unleash the next COVID-19 variant.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Risk communication and community engagement during COVID-19.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anoop T NairPrimary Health Center Chaliyar, Department of Health, Malappuram, Kerala, India.
Kesavan Rajasekharan NayarGlobal Institute of Public Health, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Shaffi Fazaludeen KoyaGlobal Institute of Public Health, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. fmshaffi@bu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1220-5754
Minu AbrahamGlobal Institute of Public Health, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Jinbert LordsonGlobal Institute of Public Health, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Chitra GraceGlobal Institute of Public Health, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Sreekutty SreekumarGlobal Institute of Public Health, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Priya ChembonGlobal Institute of Public Health, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Kamala SwarnamAnanthapuri Hospitals and Research Institute, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
A Marthanda PillaiAnanthapuri Hospitals and Research Institute, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Anant Kumar PandeyGlobal Institute of Public Health, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increased penetration of the internet and social media, there are concerns regarding its negative role in influencing parents' decisions regarding vaccination for their children. It is perceived that a mix of religious reasons and propaganda by anti-vaccination groups on social media are lowering the vaccination coverage in Malappuram district of Kerala. We undertook a qualitative study to understand the factors responsible for generating and perpetuating vaccine hesitancy, the pathways of trust deficit in immunization programs and the interaction between various social media actors.

methodsIn-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted among parents/caregivers, physicians, public sector health staff, alternative system medical practitioners, field healthcare workers and teachers in areas with highest and lowest vaccination coverage in the district, as well as with communication experts.

resultsThe trust deficit between parents/caregivers and healthcare providers is created by multiple factors, such as providers' lack of technical knowledge, existing patriarchal societal norms and critical views of vaccine by naturopaths and homeopaths. Anti-vaccine groups use social media to influence caregivers' perceptions and beliefs. Religion does not appear to play a major role in creating vaccine resistance in this setting.

conclusionsA long-term, multipronged strategy should be adopted to address the trust deficit. In the short to medium term, the health sector can focus on appropriate and targeted vaccine-related communication strategies, including the use of infographics, soft skills training for healthcare workers, technical competency improvement through a mobile application-based repository of information and creation of a media cell to monitor vaccine-related conversations in social media and to intervene if needed.

Indexed as

Social MediaVaccinesChildHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansImmunization ProgramsPatient Acceptance of Health CareTrustVaccinationVaccinesAnti-vaccine messagesSocial mediaTrust deficitVaccine hesitancyVaccine resistance

Identifiers

PMID34380514
PMCPMC8356375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.