ArticleBMC health services research2021
Facility-level conditions leading to higher reach: a configurational analysis of national VA weight management programming.
Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced Weight Management Program for Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Difference-Makers for Robust Implementation of a Nursing Home Advance Care Planning Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trial.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of a virtual quality improvement training program to improve reach of weight management programs within a large health system.Health services research · 2024Trial
- Community organization capacity and barriers to mental health promotion efforts: a configurational analysis.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Employers' utilization of and collaboration with occupational health services in preventive occupational health and safety management.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
- Optimizing qualitative methods in implementation research: a resource for editors, reviewers, authors, and researchers to dispel ten common misperceptions about qualitative research methods.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Explaining site-level fidelity within a national initiative to implement a VA patient safety guidebook: the difference-making role of networks & communications.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Difference-Making Factors Linked to Higher Reach of Specialist Palliative Care Among People With Heart Failure Across a National Sample of VA Medical Centers.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2025Article
- An evaluation of virtual supervision effectiveness within department of veterans affairs (VA) health professionals training programs.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Difference-making factors for successful implementation of a multicomponent colorectal cancer screening program in rural clinics (SMARTER CRC).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Use of Hospice and End-of-Life Care Quality Among Medical Centers with High Versus Lower Specialist Palliative Care Reach Among People with Heart Failure: An Observational Study.Journal of palliative medicine · 2024Observational
- Program Implementation Strategies Associated With Reduced Acute Care Utilization for Medicaid Beneficiaries in California's Whole Person Care Pilot Program.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2024Article
- Patient, facility, and environmental factors associated with obesity treatment in US Veterans.Obesity science & practice · 2024Article
- How context links to best practice use in long-term care homes: a mixed methods study.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center Racial and Ethnic Composition and Initiation of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Exploring the Social Determinants of Mental Health by Race and Ethnicity in Army Wives.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- Understanding Whether and How a Digital Health Intervention Improves Transition Care for Emerging Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- The role of organizational capacity in intervention efficacy in a church-based cancer education program: A configurational analysis.Global implementation research and applications · 2023Article
- Engaging Operational Partners Is Critical for Successful Implementation of Research Products: a Coincidence Analysis of Access-Related Projects in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) MOVE! weight management program is effective in helping patients lose weight and is available at every VHA medical center across the United States, reaching patients to engage them in treatment remains a challenge. Facility-based MOVE! programs vary in structures, processes of programming, and levels of reach, with no single factor explaining variation in reach. Configurational analysis, based on Boolean algebra and set theory, represents a mathematical approach to data analysis well-suited for discerning how conditions interact and identifying multiple pathways leading to the same outcome. We applied configurational analysis to identify facility-level obesity treatment program arrangements that directly linked to higher reach.
methodsA national survey was fielded in March 2017 to elicit information about more than 75 different components of obesity treatment programming in all VHA medical centers. This survey data was linked to reach scores available through administrative data. Reach scores were calculated by dividing the total number of Veterans who are candidates for obesity treatment by the number of "new" MOVE! visits in 2017 for each program and then multiplied by 1000. Programs with the top 40 % highest reach scores (n = 51) were compared to those in the lowest 40 % (n = 51). Configurational analysis was applied to identify specific combinations of conditions linked to reach rates.
resultsOne hundred twenty-seven MOVE! program representatives responded to the survey and had complete reach data. The final solution consisted of 5 distinct pathways comprising combinations of program components related to pharmacotherapy, bariatric surgery, and comprehensive lifestyle intervention; 3 of the 5 pathways depended on the size/complexity of medical center. The 5 pathways explained 78 % (40/51) of the facilities in the higher-reach group with 85 % consistency (40/47).
conclusionsSpecific combinations of facility-level conditions identified through configurational analysis uniquely distinguished facilities with higher reach from those with lower reach. Solutions demonstrated the importance of how local context plus specific program components linked together to account for a key implementation outcome. These findings will guide system recommendations about optimal program structures to maximize reach to patients who would benefit from obesity treatment such as the MOVE! PROGRAM:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.