ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021
A new classification of talocalcaneal coalitions based on computed tomography for operative planning.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Talocalcaneal Coalition: Current Concepts, Clinical Implications, and Management Strategies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 3D Mapping of Talocalcaneal Coalitions: An Aid to Surgical Approach and Excision.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Article
- Total Arthroscopic Resection of the Talocalcaneal Coalition in Adults: Key Points of Surgical Technique.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of talocalcaneal coalition resection: subtalar joint middle and posterior facet involvement versus isolated posterior facet involvement - a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Racial differences in prevalence and anatomical distribution of tarsal coalition.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent classifications emphasize the morphology of the coalition, however, subtalar joint facets involved should also be emphasized.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to develop a new classification system based on the articular facets involved to cover all coalitions and guide operative planning.
methodsPatients were diagnosed with talocalcaneal coalition using a CT scan, between January 2009 and February 2021. The coalition was classified into four main types according to the shape and nature of the coalition: I, inferiorly overgrown talus or superiorly overgrown calcaneus; II, both talus and calcaneus overgrew; III, coalition with an accessory ossicle; IV, complete osseous coalition (I-III types are non-osseous coalition). Then each type was further divided into three subtypes according to the articular facets involved. A, the coalition involving the anterior facets; M, the coalition involving the middle facets, and P, the coalition involving the posterior facets. Interobserver reliability was measured at the main type (based on nature and shape) and subtype (articular facet involved) using weighted Kappa. Results There were 106 patients (108 ft) included in this study. Overall, 8 ft (7.5%) were classified as type I, 75 ft (69.4%) as type II, 7 ft (6.5%) as type III, and 18 ft (16.7%) as type IV. Twenty-nine coalitions (26.9%) involved the posterior facets only (subtype-P), 74 coalitions (68.5%) involved both the middle and posterior facets (subtype-MP), and five coalitions (4.6%) simultaneously involved the anterior, middle, and posterior facets (subtype-AMP). Type II-MP coalition was the most common. The value of weighted Kappa for the main type was 0.93 (95%CI 0.86-0.99) (p<0.001), and the value for the subtype was 0.78 (95%CI 0.66-0.91) (p<0.001).
conclusionA new classification system of the talocalcaneal coalition to facilitate operative planning was developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.