Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380428›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Exploratory analysis of lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node status for optimal management of laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection in advanced lower rectal cancer without suspected lateral lymph node metastasis.

Masayoshi Yasui, Masayuki Ohue, Shingo Noura, Norikatsu Miyoshi, Yusuke Takahashi, Chu Matsuda, Junichi Nishimura, Naotsugu Haraguchi, Hajime Ushigome, Nozomu Nakai and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Masayoshi YasuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan. myasui-gi@umin.ac.jp.
Masayuki OhueDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Shingo NouraDepartment of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Norikatsu MiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke TakahashiDepartment of Surgery, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Chu MatsudaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Junichi NishimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Naotsugu HaraguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Hajime UshigomeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Nozomu NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Shiki FujinoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Keijiro SugimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi WadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Hidenori TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi MiyataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Otemae 3-1-69, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPOsaka University · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPToyonaka Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal mesorectal excision (TME) and lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) without radiotherapy (RT) are standard treatment for lower cT3/4 rectal cancers in Eastern countries. In comparative studies, both TME + LLND and RT + TME yield good local control. Although Japanese guidelines recommend LLND for locally advanced rectal cancers below the peritoneal reflection, LLND dissection of clinically negative lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) is controversial, and laparoscopic TME + LLND is technically challenging and time-consuming. New optical instruments for laparoscopy allow easy perioperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification using ICG. The SLN concept may facilitate accurate diagnosis of LPLN involvement, and thus reduce LLND in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Here we investigated lateral pelvic SLN navigation surgery for SLN detection during laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

methodsThis study included 21 patients with clinical StageII/III lower rectal cancer without LPLN enlargement, who underwent curative laparoscopic surgery. All patients underwent TME, followed by lateral SLN identification and biopsy using ICG, and then laparoscopic LLND. ICG fluorescence imaging was conducted using the laparoscopic near-infrared camera system.

resultsLateral SLNs were successfully identified in 16 (76.2%) of the 21 patients. Among the 15 patients without SLN tumor metastasis, the dissected lateral non-SLNs were all negative.

conclusionsA lack of metastasis in the lateral pelvic SLN seems to reflect a lack of metastases to all lateral LNs. Our present results suggest that this laparoscopic ICG-guided SLN strategy may be a low-risk and time-saving method to prevent laparoscopic LLND in cases with negative lateral pelvic lymph nodes.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsDisease ManagementDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOptical ImagingPelvisLaparoscopic surgeryLateral lymph node dissectionRectal cancerSentinel lymph node

Identifiers

PMID34380428
PMCPMC8356457
OpenAlexW3193049814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.