Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380422›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Multidimensional scale of perceived social support: evidence of validity and reliability in a Chilean adaptation for older adults.

Cristhian Pérez-Villalobos, Juan Carlos Briede-Westermeyer, Mary Jane Schilling-Norman, Sergio Contreras-Espinoza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristhian Pérez-VillalobosDepartment of Medical Education, Universidad de Concepción, Víctor Lamas 1290, Concepción, Chile.
Juan Carlos Briede-WestermeyerDepartment of Engineering Design, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Avda. España, 1680, Valparaíso, Chile. juancarlos.briede@usm.cl.ORCID 0000-0002-5746-0169
Mary Jane Schilling-NormanDepartment of Medical Education, Universidad de Concepción, Víctor Lamas 1290, Concepción, Chile.
Sergio Contreras-EspinozaStatistics Department, Universidad del Bío-Bío, Avda. Collao, Concepción, 1202, Chile.
University of Concepción · CLFederico Santa María Technical University · CLUniversity of Bío-Bío · CL

Funding

ANID 1201987CONICYT 1171037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the relevance of social support on the mental health of older adults, having an instrument to evaluate this variable is essential for research in the area. However, mainly, having instruments with suitable evidence of their psychometric properties is critical. For this reason, this study sought to evaluate the factorial and reliability structure of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support within autonomous older adults from the Province of Concepción, Chile.

methodsWe surveyed 399 older adults using quote sampling. They answered a Spanish version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, plus a sociodemographic questionnaire. We performed confirmatory factor analysis using Weighted Least Squares Means and Variances adjusted estimation (WLSMV) to compare the factor models proposes by previous studies. To evaluate reliability, we calculated Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega.

resultsThe Confirmatory factor analysis found that the 3-factors models showed the best fist index between the models with CFI = 0.991, TLI = 0.989, and SRMR = 0.035, even though RMSEA were over the cutoff point. The factors presented reliabilities from α = 0.858 to α = 0.941, and from ω = 0.937 to ω = 0.972.

conclusionsThe results support the existence of three factors for the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), differentiating the support perceived from Family, Friends, and significant others. All factors present good or excellent reliability. This solution is theoretically consistent and coherent with the literature, and it presents evidence in favor of the use of MSPSS as a measurement to distinguish the support perceived source.

Indexed as

Social SupportAgedChileFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesFactor analysisPsychometricsReliabilityScalesSocial supportValidity

Identifiers

PMID34380422
PMCPMC8359117
OpenAlexW3191130241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.