Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380246›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2021

Foliar surfaces as dust and aerosol pollution monitors: An assessment by a mining site.

Kira Zeider, Nicole Van Overmeiren, Kyle P Rine, Shana Sandhaus, A Eduardo Sáez, Armin Sorooshian, Henry C Muñoz, Mónica D Ramírez-Andreotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. In Situ Remediation Technology for Heavy Metal Contaminated Sediment: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kira ZeiderDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Nicole Van OvermeirenDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Kyle P RineDepartment of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Shana SandhausDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
A Eduardo SáezDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Armin SorooshianDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Henry C MuñozConcerned Citizens and Retired Miners Coalition of Superior, AZ, USA.
Mónica D Ramírez-AndreottaDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health's Division of Community, Environment & Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. Electronic address: mdramire@arizona.edu.

Funding

TRANSPORT OF TRACE METALS IN A POLLUTED AQUIFERP42ES004940 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Xinxin Ding · 1990 to 2026
$68.1M
SOUTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES CENTERP30ES006694 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI DEAN BILLHEIMER · 1994 to 2026
$36.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006694NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies in the southwestern United States have shown that smelting processes and mine tailings emit heavy metal(loid)s that are distributed via wind dispersion to nearby communities. With increased attention regarding the effect of air pollution on environmental health, communities have begun to use citizen/community-based monitoring techniques to measure the concentration of metal(loid)s and evaluate their air quality. This study was conducted in a mining community to assess the efficacy of foliar surfaces as compared to an inverted disc (frisbee) to sample aerosol pollutants in ambient air. The assessment was conducted by evaluating As, Pb, Cd, Cu, Al, Ni, and Zn concentrations versus distance from a former smelter, statistical and regression analyses, and enrichment factor calculations compared to similar sites worldwide. Both the foliar and frisbee collection methods had a decrease in metal(loid)s concentration as a function of distance from the retired smelter. Statistical calculations show that the collection methods had similar mean concentrations for all of the metal(loid)s of interest; however, the tests also indicate that the frisbee collection method generally collected more dust than the foliar method. The enrichment factors from both collection methods were comparable to similar studies by other mining areas referenced, except for aluminum. Since there is evidence of enrichment, correlation between methods, and citizen/community science potential, these efforts show promise for the field. Further studies should consider alternating the types of plant used for foliar collection as well as collecting samples on a more frequent basis in order to sufficiently categorize results based on meteorological conditions.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavySoil PollutantsAerosolsDustEnvironmental MonitoringMiningAerosolsDustMetals, HeavySoil PollutantsAerosolAir monitorco-created citizen scienceFoliarFugitive dustMining

Identifiers

PMID34380246
PMCPMC8362843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.