Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34380193›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022

Strengthening Research and Practice in Community Health Systems: A Research Agenda and Manifesto.

Moses Tetui, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Frida Jonsson, Eleanor Whyle, Joseph Zulu, Helen Schneider, Alison Hernandez

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Moses TetuiSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6833-7601
Anna-Karin HurtigDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7087-1467
Frida JonssonDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5902-3798
Eleanor WhyleSchool of Public Health & Family Medicine (SPHFM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4795-0703
Joseph ZuluSchool of Public Health & Family Medicine (SPHFM), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1480-4977
Helen SchneiderSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0418-1828
Alison HernandezCentre for the Study of Equity and Governance in Health Systems, Guatemala City, Guatemala.ORCID 0000-0001-7250-9891
Umeå University · SEUniversity of Cape Town · ZACenter for the Study of Equity and Governance in Health Systems · GTSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While there have been increased calls for strengthening community health systems (CHSs), key priorities for this field have not been fully articulated. This paper seeks to fill this gap, presenting a collaboratively defined research agenda, accompanied by a 'manifesto' on strengthening research and practice in the CHS. The CHS research agenda domains were developed through a modified concept mapping process with a team of 33 experts on the CHS including policy-makers, implementers and researchers from institutions in six countries: Uganda, Guatemala, South Africa, Sweden, Tanzania and Zambia. The process began remotely with brainstorming research priorities and concluded in a one-week workshop that was held in Zambia where priorities for strengthening CHS were discussed, grouped into domains, interpreted, and drafted into a collective declaration. Eight domains of research priorities for CHSs were identified: clarifying the purpose and values of the CHS, ensure inclusivity; design, implementation and monitoring of strategies to strengthen the CHS; social, political and historical contexts of CHS; community health workers (CHWs); social accountability; the interface between the CHS and the broader health system; governance and stewardship; and finally, the ethical methodologies for researching the CHS. By harnessing a set of diverse and rich experiences and perspectives on CHS through a structured process, a multifaceted research agenda and manifesto that transcend context, disciplines and time were developed. We posit this as an entry into greater debate and diversity in the field as we continue to find ways to strengthen research and practice in the CHS.

Indexed as

Community Health PlanningCommunity Health WorkersGovernment ProgramsHumansSocial ResponsibilitySouth AfricaCommunity Health SystemsDiverse ContextsMulti-disciplinaryPriority SettingResearch Agenda

Identifiers

PMID34380193
PMCPMC9278394
OpenAlexW3183188087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.