Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379679›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Testing telediagnostic right upper quadrant abdominal ultrasound in Peru: A new horizon in expanding access to imaging in rural and underserved areas.

Thomas J Marini, Daniel C Oppenheimer, Timothy M Baran, Deborah J Rubens, Ann Dozier, Brian Garra, Miguel S Egoavil, Rosemary A Quinn, Jonah Kan, Rafael L Ortega and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tele-ultrasound in the Era of COVID-19: A Practical Guide.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas J MariniDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1529-5097
Daniel C OppenheimerDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Timothy M BaranDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Deborah J RubensDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Ann DozierDepartment of Public Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Brian GarraMedical Imaging Ministries of the Americas, Clermont, Florida, United States of America.
Miguel S EgoavilMedical Innovation and Technology, San Isidro, Lima, Peru.
Rosemary A QuinnDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Jonah KanDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Rafael L OrtegaDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Yu T ZhaoDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Lorena TamayoMedical Innovation and Technology, San Isidro, Lima, Peru.
Claudia CarlottoMedical Innovation and Technology, San Isidro, Lima, Peru.
Benjamin CastanedaDepartment of Engineering, Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Peru, San Miguel, Lima, Peru.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USGlobal Ministries · USPontificia Universidad Católica del Perú · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatic and biliary diseases are prevalent worldwide, but the majority of people lack access to diagnostic medical imaging for their assessment. The liver and gallbladder are readily amenable to sonographic examination, and ultrasound is a portable, cost-effective imaging modality suitable for use in rural and underserved areas. However, the deployment of ultrasound in these settings is limited by the lack of experienced sonographers to perform the exam. In this study, we tested an asynchronous telediagnostic system for right upper quadrant abdominal ultrasound examination operated by individuals without prior ultrasound experience to facilitate deployment of ultrasound to rural and underserved areas.

methodsThe teleultrasound system utilized in this study employs volume sweep imaging and a telemedicine app installed on a tablet which connects to an ultrasound machine. Volume sweep imaging is an ultrasound technique in which an individual scans the target region utilizing preset ultrasound sweeps demarcated by easily recognized external body landmarks. The sweeps are saved as video clips for later interpretation by an experienced radiologist. Teleultrasound scans from a Peruvian clinic obtained by individuals without prior ultrasound experience were sent to the United States for remote interpretation and quality assessment. Standard of care comparison was made to a same-day ultrasound examination performed by a radiologist.

resultsIndividuals without prior ultrasound experience scanned 144 subjects. Image quality was rated "poor" on 36.8% of exams, "acceptable" on 38.9% of exams, and "excellent" on 24.3% of exams. Among telemedicine exams of "acceptable" or "excellent" image quality (n = 91), greater than 80% of the liver and gallbladder were visualized in the majority of cases. In this group, there was 95% agreement between standard of care and teleultrasound on whether an exam was normal or abnormal, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.84 (95% CI 0.7-0.98, p <0.0001). Finally, among these teleultrasound exams of "acceptable" or "excellent" image quality, the sensitivity for cholelithiasis was 93% (95% CI 68.1%-99.8%), and the specificity was 97% (95% CI 89.5%-99.6%).

conclusionThis asynchronous telediagnostic system allows individuals without prior ultrasound experience to effectively scan the liver, gallbladder, and right kidney with a high degree of agreement with standard of care ultrasound. This system can be deployed to improve access to diagnostic imaging in low-resource areas.

Indexed as

TelemedicineUltrasonographyAbdomenCholelithiasisFatty LiverHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMedically Underserved AreaPeruRural PopulationSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID34379679
PMCPMC8357175
OpenAlexW3191024687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.