ArticlePloS one2021
Contraceptive use among women through their later reproductive years: Findings from an Australian prospective cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Contraceptive use and contraceptive counselling interventions for women of reproductive age with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Contraceptive use in lesbian and bisexual women: findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Examining contraceptive utilization behavior in Pakistani women.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Patterns of contraceptive use through later reproductive years: A cohort study of Australian women with chronic disease.PloS one · 2023Article
- Patterns of contraceptive use among young Australian women with chronic disease: findings from a prospective cohort study.Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Exploring rise of pregnancy in Bangladesh resulting from contraceptive failure.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Contraception During Perimenopause: Practical Guidance.International journal of women's health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveExamine patterns of contraceptive use and contraceptive transitions over time among an Australian cohort of women through their later reproductive years. STUDY
designLatent Transition Analysis was performed using data on 8,197 women from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health's 1973-78 cohort to identify distinct patterns of contraceptive use across 2006, 2012 and 2018. Women were excluded from the analysis at time points where they were not at risk of an unintended pregnancy. Latent status membership probabilities, item-response probabilities, transitions probabilities and the effect of predictors on latent status membership were estimated and reported.
resultsPatterns of contraceptive use were relatively consistent over time, particularly for high efficacy contraceptive methods with 71% of women using long-acting reversible contraceptives in 2012 also using long-acting reversible contraceptives in 2018. Multiple contraceptive use was highest in 2006 when women were aged 28-33 years (19.3%) but declined over time to 14.3% in 2018 when women were aged 40-45 years. Overall, contraceptive patterns stabilised as the women moved into their late 30s and early 40s.
conclusionsAlthough fertility declines with age, the stability of contraceptive choice and continued use of short-acting contraception among some women suggests that a contraceptive review may be helpful for women during perimenopause so that they are provided with contraceptive options most appropriate to their specific circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.