Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379648›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Psychological characteristics and the mediating role of the 5C Model in explaining students' COVID-19 vaccination intention.

Annelot Wismans, Roy Thurik, Rui Baptista, Marcus Dejardin, Frank Janssen, Ingmar Franken

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. COVID-19 vaccination intention and vaccine hesitancy among citizens of the Métis Nation of Ontario.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Annelot WismansErasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3826-6432
Roy ThurikErasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0242-6908
Rui BaptistaCEG-IST, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
Marcus DejardinUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8415-5514
Frank JanssenUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7051-3168
Ingmar FrankenThe Erasmus University Rotterdam Institute for Behavior and Biology (EURIBEB), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLMontpellier Business School · FRUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Namur · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To achieve herd immunity against COVID-19, it is crucial to know the drivers of vaccination intention and, thereby, vaccination. As the determinants of vaccination differ across vaccines, target groups and contexts, we investigate COVID-19 vaccination intention using data from university students from three countries, the Netherlands, Belgium and Portugal. We investigate the psychological drivers of vaccination intention using the 5C model as mediator. This model includes five antecedents of vaccination: Confidence, Complacency, Constraints, Calculation and Collective Responsibility. First, we show that the majority of students have a positive propensity toward getting vaccinated against COVID-19, though only 41% of students are completely acceptant. Second, using the 5C model, we show that 'Confidence' (β = 0.33, SE = 03, p < .001) and 'Collective Responsibility' (β = 0.35, SE = 04, p < .001) are most strongly related to students' COVID-19 vaccination intention. Using mediation analyses, we show that the perceived risk and effectiveness of the vaccine as well as trust in the government and health authorities indirectly relate to vaccination intention through 'Confidence'. The perceived risk of COVID-19 for one's social circle and altruism, the need to belong and psychopathy traits indirectly relate to vaccination intention through 'Collective Responsibility'. Hence, targeting the psychological characteristics associated with 'Confidence' and 'Collective Responsibility' can improve the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns among students.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAltruismCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansRiskSARS-CoV-2Self EfficacyStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34379648
PMCPMC8357093
OpenAlexW3189111962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.