Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379637›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Diffusion enables integration of heterogeneous data and user-driven learning in a desktop knowledge-base.

Tomasz Konopka, Sandra Ng, Damian Smedley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomasz KonopkaWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3042-4712
Sandra NgWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4524-6058
Damian SmedleyWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Mouse Phenotyping Informatics Infrastructure - MP12UM1HG006370 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI Pilar Cacheiro Martinez, Helen Elizabeth Parkinson · 2016 to 2026
$20.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG006370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating reference datasets (e.g. from high-throughput experiments) with unstructured and manually-assembled information (e.g. notes or comments from individual researchers) has the potential to tailor bioinformatic analyses to specific needs and to lead to new insights. However, developing bespoke analysis pipelines from scratch is time-consuming, and general tools for exploring such heterogeneous data are not available. We argue that by treating all data as text, a knowledge-base can accommodate a range of bioinformatic data types and applications. We show that a database coupled to nearest-neighbor algorithms can address common tasks such as gene-set analysis as well as specific tasks such as ontology translation. We further show that a mathematical transformation motivated by diffusion can be effective for exploration across heterogeneous datasets. Diffusion enables the knowledge-base to begin with a sparse query, impute more features, and find matches that would otherwise remain hidden. This can be used, for example, to map multi-modal queries consisting of gene symbols and phenotypes to descriptions of diseases. Diffusion also enables user-driven learning: when the knowledge-base cannot provide satisfactory search results in the first instance, users can improve the results in real-time by adding domain-specific knowledge. User-driven learning has implications for data management, integration, and curation.

Indexed as

Knowledge BasesLearningSystems IntegrationUser-Computer InterfaceAlgorithmsDatabase Management SystemsHumans

Identifiers

PMID34379637
PMCPMC8382188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.