Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379623›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Quantitative assessment of the relationship between behavioral and autonomic dynamics during propofol-induced unconsciousness.

Sandya Subramanian, Patrick L Purdon, Riccardo Barbieri, Emery N Brown

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Cortical signatures linked to behavior quantitatively track arousal levels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Monitoring surgical nociception using multisensor physiological models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sandya SubramanianHarvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5885-1199
Patrick L PurdonDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Riccardo BarbieriDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Emery N BrownHarvard-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Project 4: Mathematical Modeling Studies of Anesthetic ActionP01GM118269 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BROWN, EMERY N · 2017 to 2021
$9.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM118269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During general anesthesia, both behavioral and autonomic changes are caused by the administration of anesthetics such as propofol. Propofol produces unconsciousness by creating highly structured oscillations in brain circuits. The anesthetic also has autonomic effects due to its actions as a vasodilator and myocardial depressant. Understanding how autonomic dynamics change in relation to propofol-induced unconsciousness is an important scientific and clinical question since anesthesiologists often infer changes in level of unconsciousness from changes in autonomic dynamics. Therefore, we present a framework combining physiology-based statistical models that have been developed specifically for heart rate variability and electrodermal activity with a robust statistical tool to compare behavioral and multimodal autonomic changes before, during, and after propofol-induced unconsciousness. We tested this framework on physiological data recorded from nine healthy volunteers during computer-controlled administration of propofol. We studied how autonomic dynamics related to behavioral markers of unconsciousness: 1) overall, 2) during the transitions of loss and recovery of consciousness, and 3) before and after anesthesia as a whole. Our results show a strong relationship between behavioral state of consciousness and autonomic dynamics. All of our prediction models showed areas under the curve greater than 0.75 despite the presence of non-monotonic relationships among the variables during the transition periods. Our analysis highlighted the specific roles played by fast versus slow changes, parasympathetic vs sympathetic activity, heart rate variability vs electrodermal activity, and even pulse rate vs pulse amplitude information within electrodermal activity. Further advancement upon this work can quantify the complex and subject-specific relationship between behavioral changes and autonomic dynamics before, during, and after anesthesia. However, this work demonstrates the potential of a multimodal, physiologically-informed, statistical approach to characterize autonomic dynamics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectroencephalographyModels, NeurologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleParasympathetic Nervous SystemPropofolSympathetic Nervous SystemUnconsciousnessPropofol

Identifiers

PMID34379623
PMCPMC8357089
OpenAlexW3189113687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.