Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379527›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2021

SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing Methods Differ in Their Abilities To Detect Variants from Low-Viral-Load Samples.

C Lam, K Gray, M Gall, R Sadsad, A Arnott, J Johnson-Mackinnon, W Fong, K Basile, J Kok, D E Dwyer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Modification of the IlluminaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

C LamCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology-Public Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
K GrayCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology-Public Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
M GallCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, NSW Health Pathology, Institute for Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
R SadsadCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology-Public Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
A ArnottCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, NSW Health Pathology, Institute for Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2637-8936
J Johnson-MackinnonCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology-Public Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
W FongCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology-Public Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
K BasileCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology Laboratory Services, NSW Health Pathology, Institute for Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
J KokCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology-Public Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
D E DwyerCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology-Public Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
V SintchenkoCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology-Public Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9261-3650
R J RockettCentre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology-Public Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4329-5198

Funding

NSW Health Office of Health and Medical Research COVID-19 Research Grant round 1NSW Ministry of Health Prevention Research Support Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genomic surveillance has been vital in understanding the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the emergence of viral escape mutants, and variants of concern. However, low viral loads in clinical specimens affect variant calling for phylogenetic analyses and detection of low-frequency variants, important in uncovering infection transmission chains. We systematically evaluated three widely adopted SARS-CoV-2 whole-genome sequencing methods for their sensitivity, specificity, and ability to reliably detect low-frequency variants. Our analyses reveal that the ARTIC v3 protocol consistently displays high sensitivity for generating complete genomes at low viral loads compared with the probe-based Illumina Respiratory Viral Oligo panel and a pooled long-amplicon method. We show substantial variability in the number and location of low-frequency variants detected using the three methods, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate methods to obtain high-quality sequence data from low-viral-load samples for public health and genomic surveillance purposes.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Base SequenceGenome, ViralHumansPhylogenyWhole Genome Sequencinggenomicspublic healthSARS-CoV-2variants

Identifiers

PMID34379527
PMCPMC8525559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.