Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379302›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2021

Non-contrast magnetic resonance lymphography (NCMRL) in cancer-related secondary lymphedema: acquisition technique and imaging findings.

Michaela Cellina, Daniele Gibelli, Carlo Martinenghi, Denisa Giardini, Massimo Soresina, Andrea Menozzi, Giancarlo Oliva, Gianpaolo Carrafiello

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. MRI of Lymphedema.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michaela CellinaDepartment of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli, Piazza Principessa Clotilde 3, 20121, Milan, Italy. michaela.cellina@asst-fbf-sacco.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7401-1971
Daniele GibelliDipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Per La Salute, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9591-1047
Carlo MartinenghiDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20121, Milan, Italy.
Denisa GiardiniLymphedema Center, Nursing Home "La Madonnina", Via Quadronno, 29, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Massimo SoresinaLymphedema Center, Nursing Home "La Madonnina", Via Quadronno, 29, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Andrea MenozziLymphedema Center, Nursing Home "La Madonnina", Via Quadronno, 29, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo OlivaDepartment of Radiology, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli, Piazza Principessa Clotilde 3, 20121, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaolo CarrafielloDepartment of Radiology, Policlinico Di Milano Ospedale Maggiore | Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Via Francesco Sforza, 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer-related secondary lymphedema (LE) is a widespread issue, which markedly affects patients' quality of life. Its diagnosis is mainly clinical since there is no consensus on the best imaging technique that should be used to assess this pathology. Even if lymphedema treatment has been traditionally conservative and mainly based on compressive bandages and decongestive therapy, new surgical techniques are proving their effectiveness in the management of the disease and made proper assessment and characterization of lymphedema necessary. In this scenario, non-contrast magnetic resonance lymphography (NCMRL) is acquiring an increasing role, as a non-invasive imaging technique, useful for the analysis of LE. NCMRL is an effective tool in diagnosis confirmation, in providing information about the structural changes of the affected limbs, in grading this disorder, and provides a guide for LE management and treatment planning. This article aims to provide an overview of the literature regarding this examination, analyzing the acquisition technique, the interpretation of the imaging findings and their usefulness, the advantages and limits of this technique, to help the radiologist approach this relatively new investigation in cases of cancer-related LE.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansLymphedemaLymphographyNeoplasmsImagingLymphedemaMagnetic resonance lymphographyProstate cancerSecondary lymphedema

Identifiers

PMID34379302
OpenAlexW3191631943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.