Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379210›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

MRI in differential diagnosis between tuberculous and pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

Nicoletta Naselli, Giancarlo Facchini, Giacomo Maria Lima, Gisberto Evangelisti, Federico Ponti, Marco Miceli, Paolo Spinnato

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Novel MRI-based quantitative signal-intensity ratio scores for differentiation of pyogenic and tuberculous spondylitis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Development and validation of a nomogram for differential diagnosis of pyogenic spondylitis and tuberculous spondylitis in China: a multicenter retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tuberculous Spondylodiscitis with Sacroiliac Joint Involvement.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. An imaging-based clinical prediction model to differentiate brucellar spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis: a multicenter retrospective observational study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Observational
  11. [Spondylitis and spondylodiscitis].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Current knowledge of vertebral osteomyelitis: a review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Differentiation of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Comprehensive Review of Imaging Techniques and Future Applications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicoletta NaselliDepartment of Radiology, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. nasellinicoletta@gmail.com.
Giancarlo FacchiniDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Giacomo Maria LimaNuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Gisberto EvangelistiDepartment of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Federico PontiDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Marco MiceliDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo SpinnatoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to investigate whether MRI findings together with epidemiological data could help in differentiating between tuberculous and pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

methodsClinical records of 260 patients with a suspicion of spondylodiscitis were analysed. Patients were selected using the following inclusion criteria: confirmed diagnosis of spondylodiscitis either from pyogenic bacteria or from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and contrast-enhanced MRI performed before treatment. Clinical data concerning age, sex and country-of-origin were also collected. For each patient, several MRI-features were evaluated by two-expert musculoskeletal radiologists. A chi-squared test and a multiple logistic regression were used to find the best predictors of tuberculous or pyogenic spondylodiscitis.

results114 patients were retrospectively enrolled, 30 with tuberculous and 84 with pyogenic spondylodiscitis. We found 18 MRI-features, significantly different between the two groups. Among these, the most strongly associated with tuberculous spondylodiscitis were: heterogeneous vertebral signal on T1w-sequences (Odds Ratio(OR) = 205.759-p < 0.001), presence of epidural abscess (OR = 86.221-p < 0.001), severe vertebral destruction (OR = 10.017-p < 0.001) and absence of epidural phlegmon (OR = 86.221-p < 0.001). Moreover, patients coming from countries with a middle-high prevalence of tuberculosis were more frequently affected by tuberculous spondylodiscitis than others were (OR = 229.136-p < 0.001). The best prediction model demonstrated a correct classification rate of 94.7%.

conclusionTo the best of our knowledge this is the largest study comparing MRI-features of tuberculous and pyogenic spondylodiscitis. The above-mentioned MRI-features and epidemiological data are crucial in the differential diagnosis between these two entities, guiding the choice of the appropriate therapy, especially when a pathogen cannot be clearly identified with other modalities.

Indexed as

DiscitisMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesMRIPyogenicSpineSpondylodiscitisTuberculous

Identifiers

PMID34379210
OpenAlexW3188328192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.