Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379196›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

An observational study for appraisal of clinical outcome and risk of mother-to-child SARS-CoV-2 transmission in neonates provided the benefits of mothers' own milk.

Priyanka Gupta, Vijay Pratap Khatana, Rashmie Prabha, Inderkant Jha, Mitasha Singh, Anil Kumar Pandey, Ashima Kesri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priyanka GuptaDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, NIT-3, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121001. drpriyankaguptakapil@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2280-204X
Vijay Pratap KhatanaDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, NIT-3, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121001.
Rashmie PrabhaDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, NIT-3, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121001.
Inderkant JhaDepartment of Pediatrics and Neonatology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, NIT-3, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121001.
Mitasha SinghDepartment of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, NIT-3, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121001.
Anil Kumar PandeyDepartment of Molecular Biology Laboratory, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, NIT-3, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121001.
Ashima KesriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, NIT-3, Faridabad, Haryana, India, 121001.
ESIC Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This observational study done during April-December 2020 at a tertiary-care hospital in Haryana (India) enrolled 152 SARS-CoV-2-exposed neonates. Among them, 150 neonates had perinatal SARS-CoV-2 exposure and 2 neonates had late postnatal exposure. Stable infant-mother dyads were roomed-in with precautions to support breastfeeding. Nasopharyngeal swabs collected from neonates were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. There was a high incidence of prematurity (23%), low birth weight (31%), intrauterine fetal distress (16%), perinatal asphyxia (6%), admission to neonatal intensive care unit (24%), and mortality (1.3%) among neonates with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 exposure. In this sub-group, 20 neonates tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab sample(s). A recent official publication by the World Health Organization emphasizes that the perinatal SARS-CoV-2-exposed neonates found RT-PCR positive once in upper respiratory (non-sterile) sample must document viral persistence in another non-sterile sample for confirmation of mother-to-child virus transmission. With this approach, only one neonate was confirmed intrapartum transmission. A telephonic follow-up in discharged neonates at 1 month of age or 1 month postexposure recorded them all to be asymptomatic and doing well.Conclusion: Neonates with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 exposure constitute a high-risk group and it is not uncommon to get a positive RT-PCR report in upper respiratory sample(s) from these babies. Majority of them do not demonstrate viral persistence. Clinical outcomes are favorable in breastfed infants roomed-in with their asymptomatic-mild symptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers following appropriate safety protocols. What is Known: •Neonates with perinatal exposure suffer a high burden of morbidities and mortality. •Still, an uncertainty exists about rooming-in and breastfeeding among neonates born to SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers. What is New: •With the policy of mother-infant rooming-in and supporting breastfeeding, none of the neonate suffered clinical illness compatible with postnatal SARS-CoV-2 transmission and infection. •Around 13% perinatal exposed neonates demonstrated SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal swab samples but the majority of them did not demonstrate viral persistence.

Indexed as

COVID-19Infectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMilk, HumanAnimalsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMothersPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2RNA, ViralBreastfeedingCOVID-19Mother-to-child transmissionOutcomeRooming-inSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34379196
PMCPMC8355567
OpenAlexW3189625307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.