Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379157›Full record

SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2022

Liposuction Assisted Gynecomastia Surgery With Minimal Periareolar Incision: a Systematic Review.

Theddeus Octavianus Hari Prasetyono, Angelica Gracia Budhipramono, Illona Andromeda

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gynecomastia Surgery: Liposuction Alone versus Liposuction with Endoscope-Assisted Glandular Excision-A Comparative Study.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theddeus Octavianus Hari PrasetyonoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Medical Staff Wing, A building, 4th Floor, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia. theddeus.h@ui.ac.id.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-4309
Angelica Gracia BudhipramonoICTEC (Indonesian Clinical Training and Education Center), Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
Illona AndromedaICTEC (Indonesian Clinical Training and Education Center), Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
University of Indonesia · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to analyse the quality of studies and revisit the liposuction assisted gynecomastia surgery performed through minimal incision.

methodsA systematic review, based on the literature in the PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Cochrane, to the treatment of Simon's grade I and II gynecomastia was conducted using keywords "gynecomastia" AND "liposuction." Study appraisal was performed using MINORS to assess the methodological quality of the paper.

resultsThere were 18 out of 415 studies eligible to review. A total of 244 out of 1628 patients with the average age of 23.13 years. Liposuction facilitated the easy handling to remove the breast tissue via small incisional design; showed consistent improved quality of life in terms of satisfaction after surgery. However, the measuring method of satisfaction rate varied, resulting in difficulties to interpret the results. Complication rates were inconsistent throughout the studies, ranging from 0.06 to 26.67%. Reoperation rate of liposuction-assisted surgery is between 0.6 and 25%. There are only two studies of a total 25 patients that are considered as good in quality. The two studies, which discuss laser-assisted liposuction technique, show minor complication of seroma in two patients. While one study shows high patient's satisfaction rate; both studies indicate high surgeon's satisfaction rate.

conclusionSmall incisional design for breast parenchymal removal in gynecomastia assisted by liposuction showed a good technical approach for consistent improvement in quality of life. However, only 2 studies reported good quality methods of non-randomized case series urging for a better quality of studies in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

GynecomastiaLipectomyMastectomy, SubcutaneousAdultHumansMaleQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34379157
OpenAlexW3189610488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.