Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379143›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

ASPECTS estimation using dual-energy CTA-derived virtual non-contrast in large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke: a dose reduction opportunity for patients undergoing repeat CT?

Maarten van den Broek, Danielle Byrne, Daniel Lyndon, Bonnie Niu, Shu Min Yu, Axel Rohr, Fabio Settecase

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maarten van den BroekDivision of Neuroradiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Room G861, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. maartenvandenbroek@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3164-619X
Danielle ByrneDivision of Neuroradiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Room G861, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Daniel LyndonDivision of Neuroradiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Room G861, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Bonnie NiuVancouver Imaging, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Shu Min YuVancouver Imaging, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Axel RohrDivision of Neuroradiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Room G861, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Fabio SettecaseDivision of Neuroradiology, Vancouver General Hospital, Room G861, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent studies have shown the feasibility of dual-energy CT (DECT) virtual non-contrast (VNC) for determining infarct extent. In this study, patients presenting with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke (AIS), we assess whether ASPECTS on DECTA-VNC differs from non-contrast CT (NCCT).

methodsAfter IRB approval, LVO-AIS patients undergoing NCCT and DECTA between October 2016 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. DECTA-VNC images were derived using Syngo.via (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). ASPECTS was scored by two blinded neuroradiologists. Square-weighted kappa statistic, diagnostic performance, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests between groups, and CT doses were calculated.

resultsFifty-one patients met inclusion criteria, with median age of 76 (IQR 67-82); 26/51 (51%) were female. Median time between last-known-well and CT was 120 min (IQR 60-252). DECTA-VNC ASPECTS score differed by ≤ 1 from consensus NCCT in 49/51 (96%) patients for reader 1 and in 46/51 (90%) for reader 2. ASPECTS on DECTA-SI and consensus NCCT differed by ≤ 1 in 45/51 (88%) for both readers. On a per ASPECTS-region basis, DECTA-VNC had 87% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 0.82% PPV, and 0.96% NPV. ASPECTS inter-rater agreement was highest for DECTA-VNC (κ = 0.71), DECTA-SI (κ = 0.48), and NCCT (κ = 0.40). NCCT median CTDIvol was 63.7 mGy (IQR 60.7-67.2); DLP was 1060.0 mGy·cm (IQR 981.0-1151.5). DECTA-VNC dose was lower: median CTDIvol was 20.9 mGy (IQR 19.8-22.2); DLP was 804.1 (IQR 691.6-869.4), p < 0.0001.

conclusionDECTA-derived VNC yielded similar ASPECTS scores as NCCT and is therefore non-inferior in early ischemia-related low attenuation edema/infarct detection in acute LVO-AIS patients. Further evaluation of the role of DECTA-VNC in AIS imaging is warranted.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeDrug TaperingFemaleGermanyHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedASPECTSCTCTADual energyStrokeVirtual non-contrast

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.