Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379084›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2021

Closing the gap between single-unit and neural population codes: Insights from deep learning in face recognition.

Connor J Parde, Y Ivette Colón, Matthew Q Hill, Carlos D Castillo, Prithviraj Dhar, Alice J O'Toole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The state of modelling face processing in humans with deep learning.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Connor J PardeSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Y Ivette ColónSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Matthew Q HillSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Carlos D CastilloUniversity of Maryland Institute of Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Prithviraj DharUniversity of Maryland Institute of Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Alice J O'TooleSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.

Funding

Human Face Representation in Deep Convolutional Neural NetworksR01EY029692 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI O'TOOLE, ALICE J · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-unit responses and population codes differ in the "read-out" information they provide about high-level visual representations. Diverging local and global read-outs can be difficult to reconcile with in vivo methods. To bridge this gap, we studied the relationship between single-unit and ensemble codes for identity, gender, and viewpoint, using a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) trained for face recognition. Analogous to the primate visual system, DCNNs develop representations that generalize over image variation, while retaining subject (e.g., gender) and image (e.g., viewpoint) information. At the unit level, we measured the number of single units needed to predict attributes (identity, gender, viewpoint) and the predictive value of individual units for each attribute. Identification was remarkably accurate using random samples of only 3% of the network's output units, and all units had substantial identity-predicting power. Cross-unit responses were minimally correlated, indicating that single units code non-redundant identity cues. Gender and viewpoint classification required large-scale pooling of units-individual units had weak predictive power. At the ensemble level, principal component analysis of face representations showed that identity, gender, and viewpoint separated into high-dimensional subspaces, ordered by explained variance. Unit-based directions in the representational space were compared with the directions associated with the attributes. Identity, gender, and viewpoint contributed to all individual unit responses, undercutting a neural tuning analogy. Instead, single-unit responses carry superimposed, distributed codes for face identity, gender, and viewpoint. This undermines confidence in the interpretation of neural representations from unit response profiles for both DCNNs and, by analogy, high-level vision.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFacial RecognitionAnimalsFaceNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID34379084
PMCPMC8363775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.