Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34379056›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Mobile App (WHEELS) to Promote a Healthy Lifestyle in Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury or Lower Limb Amputation: Usability and Feasibility Study.

Dirk Hoevenaars, Jasmijn F M Holla, Leonie Te Loo, Johan M Koedijker, Sarah Dankers, Han Houdijk, Bart Visser, Thomas W J Janssen, Sonja de Groot, Marije Deutekom and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dirk Hoevenaars *Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1209-3166
Jasmijn F M Holla *Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1204-3134
Leonie Te LooFaculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Haarlem, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8142-7692
Johan M KoedijkerFaculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Haarlem, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-4992
Sarah DankersFaculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6090-8609
Han HoudijkCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7069-1973
Bart VisserCenter for Adapted Sports Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute of Sport Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8559-9715
Thomas W J JanssenFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6762-131X
Sonja de GrootFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8463-2563
Marije DeutekomFaculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Haarlem, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-5204
WHEELS Study Groupsee Acknowledgments, .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaintaining a healthy lifestyle is important for wheelchair users' well-being, as it can have a major impact on their daily functioning. Mobile health (mHealth) apps can support a healthy lifestyle; however, these apps are not necessarily suitable for wheelchair users with spinal cord injury or lower limb amputation. Therefore, a new mHealth app (WHEELS) was developed to promote a healthy lifestyle for this population.

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to develop the WHEELS mHealth app, and explore its usability, feasibility, and effectiveness.

methodsThe WHEELS app was developed using the intervention mapping framework. Intervention goals were determined based on a needs assessment, after which behavior change strategies were selected to achieve these goals. These were applied in an app that was pretested on ease of use and satisfaction, followed by minor adjustments. Subsequently, a 12-week pre-post pilot study was performed to explore usability, feasibility, and effectiveness of the app. Participants received either a remote-guided or stand-alone intervention. Responses to semistructured interviews were analyzed using content analysis, and questionnaires (System Usability Score [SUS], and Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease) were administered to investigate usability and feasibility. Effectiveness was determined by measuring outcomes on physical activity, nutrition, sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), body composition, and other secondary outcomes pre and post intervention, and by calculating effect sizes (Hedges g).

resultsSixteen behavior change strategies were built into an app to change the physical activity, dietary, sleep, and relaxation behaviors of wheelchair users. Of the 21 participants included in the pilot study, 14 participants completed the study. The interviews and questionnaires showed a varied user experience. Participants scored a mean of 58.6 (SD 25.2) on the SUS questionnaire, 5.4 (SD 3.1) on ease of use, 5.2 (SD 3.1) on satisfaction, and 5.9 (3.7) on ease of learning. Positive developments in body composition were found on waist circumference (P=.02, g=0.76), fat mass percentage (P=.004, g=0.97), and fat-free mass percentage (P=.004, g=0.97). Positive trends were found in body mass (P=.09, g=0.49), BMI (P=.07, g=0.53), daily grams of fat consumed (P=.07, g=0.56), and sleep quality score (P=.06, g=0.57).

conclusionsThe WHEELS mHealth app was successfully developed. The interview outcomes and usability scores are reasonable. Although there is room for improvement, the current app showed promising results and seems feasible to deploy on a larger scale.

Indexed as

feasibilitylifestylelower limb amputationmHealthmobile appspinal cord injuryusabilitywheelchair users

Identifiers

PMID34379056
PMCPMC8386360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.