Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34378832›Full record

ArticleNephrology (Carlton, Vic.)2022

Consequences of the first and second COVID-19 wave on kidney transplant recipients at a large Indian transplant centre.

Vivek B Kute, Hari Shankar Meshram, Vijay V Navadiya, Sanshriti Chauhan, Dev D Patel, Sudeep N Desai, Nauka Shah, Ruchir B Dave, Subho Banerjee, Divyesh P Engineer and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vivek B KuteDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0002-2854
Hari Shankar MeshramDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9148-8168
Vijay V NavadiyaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sanshriti ChauhanDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Dev D PatelDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sudeep N DesaiDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Nauka ShahDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Ruchir B DaveDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Subho BanerjeeDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8231-9987
Divyesh P EngineerDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Himanshu V PatelDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Sciences, Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Center and Dr HL Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences (IKDRC-ITS), Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Syed Jamal RizviDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Vineet V MishraDirector, IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Institute of Transplantation Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a scarcity of data comparing the consequences of first and second COVID-19 waves on kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in India.

methodsWe conducted a single-centre retrospective study of 259 KTRs with COVID-19 to compare first wave (March 15-December 31 2020, n = 157) and second wave (April 1-May 31 2021, n = 102).

resultsKTRs during second wave were younger (43 vs. 40 years; p-value .04) and also included paediatric patients (0 vs. 5.9%; p-value .003). Symptoms were milder during the second wave (45 vs. 62.7%; p-value .007); COVID-19 positive patients had less frequent cough (32 vs. 13.8%; p-value .001), fever was less frequent (58 vs. 37%; p-value .001), and we observed fewer co-morbidities (11 vs. 20.6%; p-value .04). The percentages of neutrophils (77 vs. 83%; p-value .001) and serum ferritin (439 vs. 688; p-value .0006) were higher during second wave, while lymphocyte counts were reduced (20 vs. 14%; p-value .0001). Hydroxychloroquine (11 vs. 0%; p-value .0001) and tocilizumab (7 vs. 0%; p-value .004) were more frequently prescribed during first wave, while utilization of dexamethasone (6 vs. 27%; p-value .0001) and remdesivir (47 vs. 65%; p-value .03) increased during the second wave. Mucormycosis (1.3 vs. 10%; p-value .01) and ICU admissions (20 vs. 37.2%; p-value .002) were more frequent during second wave. The 28-day mortality rate (9.6 vs. 10%; p-value 1) was not different.

conclusionsThere has been a different clinical spectrum of COVID-19 amongst KTR with similar mortality between the two waves at a large Indian transplant centre.

Indexed as

COVID-19Kidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationAdultAge FactorsAntiviral AgentsComorbidityFemaleHumansImmunosuppression TherapyIndiaIntensive Care UnitsMaleMortalityPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19first wavekidney transplant recipientssecond wave

Identifiers

PMID34378832
PMCPMC8420491
OpenAlexW3188067485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.