ArticleJournal of animal science2021
Investigating the persistence of accuracy of genomic predictions over time in broilers.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Restructuring breeding programs 1: Integration of diversity.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Using predictivity to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations over time for growth traits in a large genotyped angus cattle population.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Incorporating information of causal variants in genomic prediction using GBLUP or machine learning models in a simulated livestock population.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- Estimation of heritabilities and genetic correlations by time slices using predictivity in large genomic models.Genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Optimizing the performance of large genomic evaluations through data truncation in Angus cattle.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Optimizing the single-step model for predicting fumonisins resistance in maize hybrids accounting for the genotype-by-environment interaction.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Genetic Analysis of Days Open in Moroccan Holstein Using Different Models to Account for Censored Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Genetic parameters and genomic prediction of growth and breast morphological traits in a crossbreed duck population.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- The importance of historically popular sires on the accuracy of genomic predictions of young animals in the US Holstein population.JDS communications · 2023Article
- Strategies to improve genomic predictions for 35 duck carcass traits in an FJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Efficient ways to combine data from broiler and layer chickens to account for sequential genomic selection.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Assessment of long-term trends in genetic mean and variance after the introduction of genomic selection in layers: a simulation study.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study for Body Conformation Traits and Fitness in Czech Holsteins.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Correcting for base-population differences and unknown parent groups in single-step genomic predictions of Norwegian Red cattle.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Assessment the effect of genomic selection and detection of selective signature in broilers.Poultry science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accuracy of genomic predictions is an important component of the selection response. The objectives of this research were: 1) to investigate trends for prediction accuracies over time in a broiler population of accumulated phenotypes, genotypes, and pedigrees and 2) to test if data from distant generations are useful to maintain prediction accuracies in selection candidates. The data contained 820K phenotypes for a growth trait (GT), 200K for two feed efficiency traits (FE1 and FE2), and 42K for a carcass yield trait (CY). The pedigree included 1,252,619 birds hatched over 7 years, of which 154,318 from the last 4 years were genotyped. Training populations were constructed adding 1 year of data sequentially, persistency of accuracy over time was evaluated using predictions from birds hatched in the three generations following or in the years after the training populations. In the first generation, before genotypes became available for the training populations (first 3 years of data), accuracies remained almost stable with successive additions of phenotypes and pedigree to the accumulated dataset. The inclusion of 1 year of genotypes in addition to 4 years of phenotypes and pedigree in the training population led to increases in accuracy of 54% for GT, 76% for FE1, 110% for CY, and 38% for FE2; on average, 74% of the increase was due to genomics. Prediction accuracies declined faster without than with genomic information in the training populations. When genotypes were unavailable, the average decline in prediction accuracy across traits was 41% from the first to the second generation of validation, and 51% from the second to the third generation of validation. When genotypes were available, the average decline across traits was 14% from the first to the second generation of validation, and 3% from the second to the third generation of validation. Prediction accuracies in the last three generations were the same when the training population included 5 or 2 years of data, and a decrease of ~7% was observed when the training population included only 1 year of data. Training sets including genomic information provided an increase in accuracy and persistence of genomic predictions compared with training sets without genomic data. The two most recent years of pedigree, phenotypic, and genomic data were sufficient to maintain prediction accuracies in selection candidates. Similar conclusions were obtained using validation populations per year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.