Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34378185›Full record

ArticleHeadache2021

Headache infusion centers: A survey on treatments provided, infusion center operations, and barriers to developing new infusion centers.

Lauren Doyle Strauss, Marianna Shnayderman Yugrakh, Kayla E Kaplan, Mia T Minen, AHS Emergency Department, Inpatient, Refractory Special Interest Group

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren Doyle StraussDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Brenner Children's Hospital, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Marianna Shnayderman YugrakhDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kayla E KaplanBarnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Mia T MinenDepartment of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
AHS Emergency Department, Inpatient, Refractory Special Interest Group
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USBarnard College · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

Progressive Muscle Relaxation for Chronic Pain in an Acute Care SettingK23AT009706 · NCCIH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MINEN, MIA · 2018 to 2022
$923k
NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT009706NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT009706-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfusion therapy refers to the intravenous administration of medicines and fluids for the treatment of status migrainosus, severe persistent headaches, or chronic headache. Headache practices and centers offer this treatment for patients as an alternative to the emergency department (ED) setting. However, little information is available in the literature on understanding the operations of an infusion center.

objectiveWe sought to survey the Inpatient Headache & Emergency Medicine specialty section and the Academic Program Directors listserv of the American Headache Society (AHS) to better understand current practices.

methodsA survey was advertised and distributed to the listservs of both the Inpatient Headache & Emergency Medicine specialty section and the Academic Program Directors, which combined included both academic and private practices. In addition, the survey was available on laptops at related events at an annual AHS meeting in Scottsdale.

resultsOf the 127 members of the combined group of both listservs, 50 responded with an overall survey response rate of 39%. Ten out of fifty were from programs with more than one responder completing the survey, leaving 40 unique headache programs. Academic programs made up the majority of programs (85%, 34/40). The total of 40 participating programs is comparable with the 47 academic headache programs listed on the American Migraine Foundation website at the time of the survey. Of the academic programs surveyed, most were hospital based (n = 23) compared with a satellite location (n = 11). Of all programs surveyed, 68% (27/40) offered infusion therapy. Of those that did not have an infusion practice (n = 13), the most common reason cited was insufficient staffing (n = 8). Key highlights of the survey included the following: The majority of programs offering infusions obtain prior authorization before scheduling (70%, 19/27) and offer patient availability 5 days/week (78%, 21/27) typically only during business hours (81%, 22/27). Programs reported that they typically give three to four medications during each infusion session (72%, 18/25). Treatment paradigms varied between programs. Programs surveyed were concentrated in the Northeast and Midwest regions of the United States.

conclusionThe limited number of headache infusion centers overall may contribute to the limited ability of headache infusion centers to prevent ED migraine visits. Headache patients can have unpredictable headache onset, and most of the infusion practices surveyed appeared to adapt to this by offering infusions most days during a work week. However, this need for multiple days per week may also explain the most common reason for not having an infusion practice, which is insufficient staffing. Various treatment paradigms are implemented by different practitioners, and future studies will have to focus on investigation of best practice.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHome Infusion TherapyHeadache DisordersHealth Care SurveysHumansInfusions, IntravenousMidwestern United StatesMigraine DisordersNew Englandheadacheinfusion centerintravenous medicationsschedulingtreatment paradigms

Identifiers

PMID34378185
PMCPMC8721518
OpenAlexW3192394180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.