Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34378137›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Bioaccumulation and transfer of zinc in soil plant and animal system: a health risk assessment for the grazing animals.

Fu Chen, Fatima Ghulam Muhammad, Zafar Iqbal Khan, Kafeel Ahmad, Ifra Saleem Malik, Asma Ashfaq, Majida Naeem, Muhammad Nadeem, Jing Ma, Muhammad Umer Farooq Awan and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fu ChenSchool of Environmental Science and Spatial Informatics, China University Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Fatima Ghulam MuhammadDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Zafar Iqbal KhanDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan. zafar.khan@uos.edu.pk.
Kafeel AhmadDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Ifra Saleem MalikDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Asma AshfaqDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Majida NaeemDepartment of Botany, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Muhammad NadeemInstitute of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Jing MaSchool of Environmental Science and Spatial Informatics, China University Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China.
Muhammad Umer Farooq AwanDepartment of Botany, Govt. College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Shahzadi MahparaDepartment Plant Breeding and Genetics, Ghazi University Dera Ghazi Khan, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.
Shahid MehmoodInstitute of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
University of Sargodha · PKChina University of Mining and Technology · CNGhazi University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy metals pollution has thorough worldwide apprehensions due to the instantaneous growth of industries. Farming regions are irrigated mainly with wastewater which contains both municipal and industrial emancipations. Keeping in view the above scenario, a study was designed in which three sites irrigated with ground, canal, and municipal wastewater in the District Jhang were selected to determine the zinc accumulation and its transfer in the soil, plant, and animal food chain. Zinc concentration was ranged as 18.85-35.59mg/kg in the soil, 26.42-42.67 mg/kg in the forage, and 0.982-2.85mg/kg in the animal samples. Investigated zinc concentration in soil and forages was found to be within the recommended WHO/FAO limits, but blood samples exceed the standards of NRC (2007). The maximum level of pollution load index (0.427-0.805mg/kg) and enrichment factor (0.373-0.894 mg/kg) for zinc was noticed upon wastewater irrigation. Daily intake (0.039 to 0.082 mg/kg/day) and health risk index (0.130 to 0.275 mg/kg/day) of zinc metal was higher in the buffaloes that feed on wastewater-irrigated forages. Bio-concentration factor (0.840 to 2.01mg/kg) for soil-forage was >1 which represents that these plants accumulated the zinc concentration into their tissues and raised health issues in grazing animals on consumption of wastewater-contaminated forages. As animal-derived products are part of human food, then zinc toxicity prevailed in livestock tissues ultimately affects the human food chain. Overall, findings of this study concluded that animal herds should be monitored periodically to devise preventive measures regarding the toxic level of heavy metals availability to livestock.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavySoil PollutantsAnimalsBioaccumulationEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRisk AssessmentSoilWastewaterZincMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsWastewaterZincBio-concentration factorForageHeavy metalJhangLivestockPollutionWastewater

Identifiers

PMID34378137
OpenAlexW3174829571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.