ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022
Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging technique diagnoses DVT and classifies thrombus.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Venous thromboembolism in China: epidemiology, management strategies, and future directions.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Integrated multi-omics and machine learning identify an interaction between SLC39A11 and phosphoinositide metabolism in deep vein thrombosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accuracy of non-contrast MRI in diagnosing acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities is different. To explore the application of high-resolution non-contrast 3D CUBE T1-weighted MRI in the lower extremities DVT. We recruited 26 patients suspected DVT of the lower extremities from Hebei General Hospital in China. All patients underwent high-resolution non-contrast 3D CUBE T1-weighted MRI. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of diagnosing thrombosis. And we divided thrombi into two parts: filling thrombus (FT) and non-filling thrombus (NFT), compared the agreement between MRI and Ultrasound (US) and analysed the locations of thrombi. Compared with US, MRI yielded a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 94.2% in mean value, a sensitivity of 85.7%, 97.4%, and 51.7% in iliac, femoral-popliteal, and calf segments respectively, a specificity of 97.6%, 88.3%, and 98.2% in iliac, femoral-popliteal, and in calf segments respectively. The accuracy of MRI in the diagnosis of lower extremity DVT was in very good agreement (κ = 0.711, 95% CI 0.627, 0.795). The FT was the most part in US and CUBE (68/56), CUBE can detect more NFT in femoral vein than US (22/4). 3D CUBE T1-weighted MRI can be used to accurately diagnose acute DVT and detect more NFT. It has the potential of follow-up at the end of treatment to establish a new baseline to stop anticoagulant drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.