Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34378077›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Visualization of wrist anatomy-a comparison between 7T and 3T MRI.

Simon Götestrand, Anders Björkman, Isabella M Björkman-Burtscher, Ingvar Kristiansson, Elenya Aksyuk, Pawel Szaro, Karin Markenroth Bloch, Mats Geijer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Ulnar-Sided Wrist Pain.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon GötestrandDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. simon.gotestrand@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-3786
Anders BjörkmanDepartment of Hand Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0600-1365
Isabella M Björkman-BurtscherDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-3363
Ingvar KristianssonDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Elenya AksyukDepartment of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Pawel SzaroDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0334-7232
Karin Markenroth BlochLund University Bioimaging Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-6667
Mats GeijerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0529-7723

Funding

Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset ALFGBG-925851Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset SU 2018-03591Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset SU 2018-03903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInjuries to the wrist are, due to its small size and complex anatomical structures, difficult to assess by MR, and surgical interventions such as diagnostic arthroscopy are often necessary. Therefore, improved visualization using non-invasive methods could be of clinical value. As a first step of improvement, the purpose of this study was to evaluate visualization of anatomical structures at 7T compared with 3T MR.

methodsEighteen healthy volunteers (three males and three females from each age decade between 20 and 49 years) were examined with 7T and 3T MR. Four musculoskeletal radiologists graded 2D and 3D images on a five-level grading scale for visibility of ligaments, cartilage, nerves, trabecular bone, and tendons, as well as overall image quality (i.e., edge sharpness, perceived tissue contrast, and presence of artefacts). Statistical analysis was done using a visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis.

resultsVisibility of cartilage, trabecular bone, tendons, nerves, and ligaments was graded significantly higher at 7T with an area under the curve (AUC

conclusionsTendons, trabecular bone, nerves, and ligaments were all significantly better visualized at 7T compared to 3T. KEY POINTS: • MRI of the wrist at 7T with a commercially available wrist coil is feasible at similar acquisition times as for 3T MRI. • The current study showed 7T to be superior to 3T in the visualization of anatomical structures of the wrist, including ligaments, tendons, nerves, and trabecular bone. • Image quality was significantly superior at 7T, except for artefacts, where no significant differences were found.

Indexed as

WristWrist InjuriesAdultFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedWrist JointYoung AdultArea under curveCarpal jointsCartilage, articularLigamentsTriangular fibrocartilage

Identifiers

PMID34378077
PMCPMC8795032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.