ArticleJournal of aging and environment2020
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Assessment of the Environment for Person-Centered Management of BPSD and Assessment of Policies for Person-Centered Management of BPSD Measures.
Article in Journal of aging and environment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Process evaluation of an implementation study in dementia care (EIT-4-BPSD): stakeholder perspectives.BMC health services research · 2021Trial
- Challenges when measuring person-centred dementia care in nursing homes: a discussion paper.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Describing the status quo of person-centred dementia care in different types of care units in German nursing homes: A convergent mixed methods study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Assessing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: a comprehensive review of current options and future perspectives.Frontiers in dementia · 2023Review
- Measuring person-centred care in german nursing homes - exploring the construct validity of the Dementia Policy Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study of a secondary data set.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Assessment of the Environment for Person-Centered Management of BPSD and the Assessment of Policies for Person-Centered Management of BPSD. The sample included 35 long term care facilities. There was evidence of reliability based on internal consistency and test-retest reliability of both measures. There was some evidence of validity based on Rasch model testing and INFIT and OUTFIT statistics. Across both measures there were six items with that were endorsed as present by all facilities. The INFIT and OUTFIT statistics were all within the expected range of .5 to 1.5 with the exception of four high OUTFIT statistics for the Assessment of the Environment for Person-Centered Management of BPSD. For the Assessment of Policies for Person-Centered Management of BPSD there were two items that had high INFIT statistics and six with low OUTFIT statistics and one with high OUTFIT statistics. Measure revisions are suggested including removal of some poor fitting items, items with no variance, and adding items to differentiate those very high in evidence of environments and policies that manage BPSD.
Identifiers
34378006PMC8351619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.