ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021
CONSULT: accurate contamination removal using locality-sensitive hashing.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- krepp: a k-mer-based maximum pseudo-likelihood method for estimating read distances and genome-wide phylogenetic placement.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Contamination of fungal genomes of Onygenaceae (Phylum Ascomycota) in public databases: incidence, detection, and impact.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Memory-boundGenome research · 2024Article
- A nuclear genome assembly of an extinct flightless bird, the little bush moa.Science advances · 2024Article
- CONSULT-II: accurate taxonomic identification and profiling using locality-sensitive hashing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- ContScout: sensitive detection and removal of contamination from annotated genomes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- GTax: improving de novo transcriptome assembly by removing foreign RNA contamination.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Ten common issues with reference sequence databases and how to mitigate them.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Creating and Using Minimizer Sketches in Computational Genomics.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2023Review
- Quantifying the uncertainty of assembly-free genome-wide distance estimates and phylogenetic relationships using subsampling.Cell systems · 2022Article
- Genomic Analysis of Mycobacterium abscessus Complex Isolates from Patients with Pulmonary Infection in China.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Contamination detection in genomic data: more is not enough.Genome biology · 2022Review
- Estimating repeat spectra and genome length from low-coverage genome skims with RESPECT.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A fundamental question appears in many bioinformatics applications: Does a sequencing read belong to a large dataset of genomes from some broad taxonomic group, even when the closest match in the set is evolutionarily divergent from the query? For example, low-coverage genome sequencing (skimming) projects either assemble the organelle genome or compute genomic distances directly from unassembled reads. Using unassembled reads needs contamination detection because samples often include reads from unintended groups of species. Similarly, assembling the organelle genome needs distinguishing organelle and nuclear reads. While k-mer-based methods have shown promise in read-matching, prior studies have shown that existing methods are insufficiently sensitive for contamination detection. Here, we introduce a new read-matching tool called CONSULT that tests whether k-mers from a query fall within a user-specified distance of the reference dataset using locality-sensitive hashing. Taking advantage of large memory machines available nowadays, CONSULT libraries accommodate tens of thousands of microbial species. Our results show that CONSULT has higher true-positive and lower false-positive rates of contamination detection than leading methods such as Kraken-II and improves distance calculation from genome skims. We also demonstrate that CONSULT can distinguish organelle reads from nuclear reads, leading to dramatic improvements in skim-based mitochondrial assemblies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.