Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377979›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021

CONSULT: accurate contamination removal using locality-sensitive hashing.

Eleonora Rachtman, Vineet Bafna, Siavash Mirarab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Memory-boundGenome research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Creating and Using Minimizer Sketches in Computational Genomics.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eleonora RachtmanBioinformatics and Systems Biology Graduate Program, UC San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6104-5750
Vineet BafnaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, UC San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Siavash MirarabDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UC San Diego, CA 92093, USA.

Funding

Computational methods for detecting patterns of complex genomic variationR01GM114362 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Vineet Bafna · 2016 to 2026
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental question appears in many bioinformatics applications: Does a sequencing read belong to a large dataset of genomes from some broad taxonomic group, even when the closest match in the set is evolutionarily divergent from the query? For example, low-coverage genome sequencing (skimming) projects either assemble the organelle genome or compute genomic distances directly from unassembled reads. Using unassembled reads needs contamination detection because samples often include reads from unintended groups of species. Similarly, assembling the organelle genome needs distinguishing organelle and nuclear reads. While k-mer-based methods have shown promise in read-matching, prior studies have shown that existing methods are insufficiently sensitive for contamination detection. Here, we introduce a new read-matching tool called CONSULT that tests whether k-mers from a query fall within a user-specified distance of the reference dataset using locality-sensitive hashing. Taking advantage of large memory machines available nowadays, CONSULT libraries accommodate tens of thousands of microbial species. Our results show that CONSULT has higher true-positive and lower false-positive rates of contamination detection than leading methods such as Kraken-II and improves distance calculation from genome skims. We also demonstrate that CONSULT can distinguish organelle reads from nuclear reads, leading to dramatic improvements in skim-based mitochondrial assemblies.

Identifiers

PMID34377979
PMCPMC8340999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.