Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377978›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2021

PHROG: families of prokaryotic virus proteins clustered using remote homology.

Paul Terzian, Eric Olo Ndela, Clovis Galiez, Julien Lossouarn, Rubén Enrique Pérez Bucio, Robin Mom, Ariane Toussaint, Marie-Agnès Petit, François Enault

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 297 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
297citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
46.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

297 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 410 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Genome sequences of sixMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Extensive library ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

237 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Paul TerzianUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LMGE, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Eric Olo NdelaUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LMGE, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Clovis GaliezUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK, 38000 Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0560-6023
Julien LossouarnUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Rubén Enrique Pérez BucioUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LMGE, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Robin MomUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LMGE, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Ariane ToussaintCellular and Molecular Microbiology, IBMM-DBM, Université libre de Bruxelles, 6041 Gosselies, Belgium.
Marie-Agnès PetitUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
François EnaultUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LMGE, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4968-3995
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAgroParisTech · FRInstitut polytechnique de Grenoble · FRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses are abundant, diverse and ancestral biological entities. Their diversity is high, both in terms of the number of different protein families encountered and in the sequence heterogeneity of each protein family. The recent increase in sequenced viral genomes constitutes a great opportunity to gain new insights into this diversity and consequently urges the development of annotation resources to help functional and comparative analysis. Here, we introduce PHROG (Prokaryotic Virus Remote Homologous Groups), a library of viral protein families generated using a new clustering approach based on remote homology detection by HMM profile-profile comparisons. Considering 17 473 reference (pro)viruses of prokaryotes, 868 340 of the total 938 864 proteins were grouped into 38 880 clusters that proved to be a 2-fold deeper clustering than using a classical strategy based on BLAST-like similarity searches, and yet to remain homogeneous. Manual inspection of similarities to various reference sequence databases led to the annotation of 5108 clusters (containing 50.6 % of the total protein dataset) with 705 different annotation terms, included in 9 functional categories, specifically designed for viruses. Hopefully, PHROG will be a useful tool to better annotate future prokaryotic viral sequences thus helping the scientific community to better understand the evolution and ecology of these entities.

Identifiers

PMID34377978
PMCPMC8341000
OpenAlexW3189053267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.