Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377957›Full record

ArticleFASEB bioAdvances2021

Measuring and interpreting pervasive heterogeneity, poikilosis.

Mauno Vihinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB bioAdvances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mauno VihinenDepartment of Experimental Medical Science Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9614-7976

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurements are widely used in science, engineering, industry, and trade. They form the basis for experimental scientific research, approach, and progress; however, their foundations are seldom thought or questioned. Recently poikilosis, pervasive heterogeneity ranging from subatomic level to biosphere, was introduced. Poikilosis makes single point measurements and estimates obsolete and irrelevant as measurands display intervals of magnitudes. Consideration of poikilosis requires new lines of thinking in experimental design, conduction of studies, data analysis and interpretation. Measurements of poikilosis must consider lagom, normal, variation extent. Measurements, measures, and measurands as well as the measuring systems and uncertainties are discussed from the perspective of poikilosis. New systematics is introduced for description of uncertainty in measurements and for types of experimental designs. Poikilosis-aware experimenting, data analysis and interpretation are discussed. Instructions are provided for how to measure lagom and non-lagom effects of poikilosis. Consideration of poikilosis can solve scientific controversies and enigmas and can allow novel insight into systems, processes, mechanisms, and reactions and their interpretation, understanding, and manipulation. Furthermore, it will increase reproducibility of measurements and studies.

Indexed as

experimental designheterogeneitylagommeasurandmeasurementmeasurement uncertaintypoikilosis

Identifiers

PMID34377957
PMCPMC8332472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.