Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377941›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2021

Constraints on the Ecomorphological Convergence of Zooplanktivorous Butterflyfishes.

J R Hodge, Y Song, M A Wightman, A Milkey, B Tran, A Štajner, A S Roberts, C R Hemingson, P C Wainwright, S A Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J R HodgeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-8559
Y SongDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
M A WightmanDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
A MilkeyDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
B TranDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
A ŠtajnerDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
A S RobertsDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
C R HemingsonCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.
P C WainwrightDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
S A PriceDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1389-8521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether distantly related organisms evolve similar strategies to meet the demands of a shared ecological niche depends on their evolutionary history and the nature of form-function relationships. In fishes, the visual identification and consumption of microscopic zooplankters, selective zooplanktivory, is a distinct type of foraging often associated with a suite of morphological specializations. Previous work has identified inconsistencies in the trajectory and magnitude of morphological change following transitions to selective zooplanktivory, alluding to the diversity and importance of ancestral effects. Here we investigate whether transitions to selective zooplanktivory have influenced the morphological evolution of marine butterflyfishes (family Chaetodontidae), a group of small-prey specialists well known for several types of high-precision benthivory. Using Bayesian ancestral state estimation, we inferred the recent evolution of zooplanktivory among benthivorous ancestors that hunted small invertebrates and browsed by picking or scraping coral polyps. Traits related to the capture of prey appear to be functionally versatile, with little morphological distinction between species with benthivorous and planktivorous foraging modes. In contrast, multiple traits related to prey detection or swimming performance are evolving toward novel, zooplanktivore-specific optima. Despite a relatively short evolutionary history, general morphological indistinctiveness, and evidence of constraint on the evolution of body size, convergent evolution has closed a near significant amount of the morphological distance between zooplanktivorous species. Overall, our findings describe the extent to which the functional demands associated with selective zooplanktivory have led to generalizable morphological features among butterflyfishes and highlight the importance of ancestral effects in shaping patterns of morphological convergence.

Identifiers

PMID34377941
PMCPMC8341894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.