Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34377842›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2021

On-line daily plan optimization combined with a virtual couch shift procedure to address intrafraction motion in prostate magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy.

Daan M de Muinck Keizer, Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp, Eline N de Groot-van Breugel, Bas W Raaymakers, Jan J W Lagendijk, Hans C J de Boer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prostate motion in magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy and its impact on margins.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daan M de Muinck KeizerUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jochem R N van der Voort van ZypUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Eline N de Groot-van BreugelUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Bas W RaaymakersUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jan J W LagendijkUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Hans C J de BoerUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIn daily adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy, plans are adapted based on the patient's daily anatomy. During this adaptation phase, prostate intrafraction motion (IM) can occur. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of always applying a subsequent virtual couch shift (VCS) to counter IM that occurred during the daily contour and plan adaption (CPa) procedure. MATERIAL AND

methodsOne hundred fifty patients with low and intermediate risk prostate cancer were treated with 5x7.25 Gy fractions on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. In each fraction, contour adaptation and dose re-optimization was performed using the session's first MR-scan. IM that occurred here was countered using two methods. One patient group had selective VCS (sVCS) applied if the CTV reached outside the PTV on a second MR acquired during plan optimization. The other group had always VCS (aVCS) applied for any prostate shift greater than 1 mm. Remaining IM during beam delivery was determined using 3D cine-MR.

resultsPercentage of fractions where a VCS was applied was 28% (sVCS) vs 78% (aVCS). Always applying VCS significantly reduced influences of systematic prostate IM. Population random and systematic median values in all translations directions were lower for the aVCS than sVCS group, but not for the population random cranial-caudal direction.

conclusionApplying VCS after daily CPa reduced impact of systematic prostate drift in especially the posterior and caudal translation direction. However, due to the continuous and stochastical nature of prostate IM, margin reduction below 4 mm requires fast intrafraction plan adaption methods.

Indexed as

Intrafraction motionMR-guided radiotherapyMR-LinacPlan adaptationProstate cancerSoft-tissue registration

Identifiers

PMID34377842
PMCPMC8327343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.